Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking to Achieve Zero Defect Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents methods for continuous improvement to achieve Zero Defect Manufacturing (ZDM) with focus on the shop floor and machine level. Benchmarking and best practices a part of Total Quality Management (TQM). To make a good product or production processes system it is important to focus on the working performance efficiency. Best practice or Benchmarking are then methods to focus on the best possible method to understand working processes, systems and performance ability. The EU-Project IFaCOM (Intelligent Fault Correction and Self-Optimizing Manufacturing systems) has five end-user demonstrators where Zero Defect Manufacturing (ZDM) solutions are to be implemented. The main goal for the project IFaCOM is to reach near ZDM. The ZDM framework is a quality controlled process system. The added value of the quality improvement is both a part of the continuous flow process; and the continuous improvement of value to the costumer. It is here where the usage of Benchmarking and Best practice methods will be considered for the project industry demonstrator implementations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

609-614

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Halpin, J. F. Zero Defects: A New Dimension in Quality Assurance., New York: McGraw-Hill, (1966).

Google Scholar

[2] Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (1996).

Google Scholar

[3] Ostbolm, S. Karloft, B, Benchmarking, Veiviser til forberdret produktivitet og kvalitet, (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] Andreasen, M. , Myrup, M., Hein, L., Integrert Produktutvikling, Universitetsforlaget, (1986).

Google Scholar

[5] Lochner, R. H. & Matar, J. E: Designing for Quality, An introduction to the best of Taguchi and western methods of statistical experimental design, 1990: Chapman and Hall, New York.

Google Scholar

[6] Kotter, J. P. Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, p.8, (1995).

Google Scholar

[7] Beckford, J. Quality; A Critical introduction, Florence, KY, USA: Routledge, (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] Patterson, J. P. Benchmarking Basiscs: Looking for a Better Way, Boston: Crisp Publications, (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] PMI, Project Management Institute, Standards for OMQ3, Organizational Project management Maturity Model, (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] Taguchi, G., Introduction to Quality Engineering, (1986).

Google Scholar

[11] Oztemel, E., Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Springer Verlag, London, New York (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] Pennypacker, J. S. & Grant, K., Project Management Maturity, And Industry Benchmark, Project Managemet Journal, 2003Vol. 34, No. 1 4-11.

Google Scholar

[13] Myklebust, O., Xirouchakis, P., Lien, T., 4ZDM Zero Defect Manufacturing, NTNU, 01 11 2013. http: /www. 4zdm. eu/. ( 2013).

Google Scholar

[14] Broberg, K. Cracks and Fracture, in Cracks and Fracture, e-book, Academic Press, (1999).

Google Scholar

[15] Anantatmula, V. and Thomas, M., Managing Global Projects, A structured Approach for Better Performance, Project Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, p.60–72, (2010).

DOI: 10.1002/pmj.20168

Google Scholar