The Mechanical Properties Comparative Analysis for Socked and Non-Socketed Composite Pile

Article Preview

Abstract:

For socked and non-socketed piles in the different mechanical behavior under static and dynamic loads, the paper use ABAQUS to model, simulate the pile , the soil interlayer thickness between the bottom of the pile and bedrock are 2m, 4m under vertical load and Earthquake, cushion cap, pile and pile soil stress situation found non-socketed piles when the soil interlayer thickness within a certain range, the composite pile small subside under dynamic, static loads, the non-socketed piles can better take advantage of the pile soil has a good seismic performance in the earthquake.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1061-1062)

Pages:

748-750

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zai Jin min. Composite pile foundation pile soil load share clear and its design method, Journal of building structures, 1995, 31: 193-196.

Google Scholar

[2] Miss Zhao, Huang Zhihong. Embedded numerical rock pile friction analysis, method of engineering application of building science, 2014, 17-22.

Google Scholar

[3] Tang bin, Yu Xiao, Wang Yuexiang. Finite element region of soil pile cap pile group effect coefficient analysis (J). Rock and soil mechanics, 2003, 18 (3): 27-31.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhao Minghua, Lei Yong, Liu Xiaoming analysis (J). The embedded rock pile load transfer of pile based on the characteristics of rock structural surface. Journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2009, 24 (4): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[5] Xia Linong, Miao Yundong, Tan iron strong. With group piles of negative skin friction resistance traits of three dimensional finite element analysis (J). Rock and soil mechanics, 2012, 18 (3): 47-51.

Google Scholar