An Appraisal of Turbulence Dissipation Rate Estimation Methods Using Large Eddy Simulation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Various methods –direct methods, structure function methods and dimensional analysis-have been proposed to estimate the dissipate rate of turbulent kinetic energy. In this study these methods were appraised using LES data of a turbulent flow in the straight pipe at Re=5300. The fact that the corrected second-order structure function method is robust can be found. Note that when approaching to the wall at low Reynolds number, structure function methods and dimensional analysis method usually become inaccurate since they can not reflect information about the radial gradients. Direct computation methods now give acceptable trend and good estimation. Methods mentioned above lead to the same order of magnitude as values from DNS data most times.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1070-1072)

Pages:

1951-1956

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A Delafosse, M L Collignon, M Crine, et al. Chem Eng Sci, 2011, 66(8): 1728-1737.

Google Scholar

[2] W A M Nimmo Smith, J Katz, T R Osborn. 2005, 35(1): 72-93.

Google Scholar

[3] R S Azad, S Z Kassab. Exp Fluids, 1989, 7(2): 81-87.

Google Scholar

[4] S C C Bailey, M Hultmark, J Schumacher, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2009. 103: 014502.

Google Scholar

[5] A Etebari, P P Vlachos. Exp Fluids, 2005, 39(6): 1040-1050.

Google Scholar

[6] T Tanaka, J K Eaton. Exp Fluids, 2007, 42(6): 893-902.

Google Scholar

[7] P Lavoie, G Avallone, F De Gregorio, et al. Exp Fluids, 2007, 43(1): 39-51.

Google Scholar

[8] J De Jone, L Cao, S H Woodward, et al. Exp Fluids, 2009, 46(3): 499-515.

Google Scholar

[9] K V Sharp, R J Adrian. Aiche J, 2001, 47(4): 766-778.

Google Scholar

[10] J Sheng, H Meng, R O Fox. Chem Eng Sci, 2000, 55(20): 4423-4434.

Google Scholar

[11] K V Sharp, K C Kim, R J Adrian. SME/JSME Fluids Engineering Meeting. San Francisco, CA(1999).

Google Scholar

[12] P K Yeung, Y Zhou. Phys Rev E, 1997, 56(2): 1746-1752.

Google Scholar

[13] K R Sreenivasan. Phys Fluids, 1998, 10(2): 528-529.

Google Scholar

[14] N Mazellier, J C Vassilicos. Phys Fluids, 2008, 20: 015101.

Google Scholar

[15] P Burattini, P Lavoie, R A Antonia. Phys Fluids, 2005, 17: 098103.

Google Scholar

[16] P Loulou, R D Moser, N N Mansour. 1997, NASA technical Memo.

Google Scholar

[17] J M Foucaut, J Carlier, M Stanislas. Meas Sci Technol, 2004, 15(6): 1046-1058.

Google Scholar