The Optimal Growth under Catastrophic Climate Change of Far Distant Future

Article Preview

Abstract:

Economic theory has two difficulties to deal with catastrophic climate change events: 1) the impacts are so high that may damage the whole civilization, 2) the impact could only be realized in the far distant future. Discounted utilitarianism fail to explain why society would be willing to prevent catastrophes that could only happen in the far distant future. This paper proves that Chichilnisky’s social welfare criterion could be applied for the issue of catastrophic climate change. Applying this criterion to an “AK” economy with abatement technology, I examine the effects of catastrophic risk on growth and welfare.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

2836-2842

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Basu, K. and T. Mitra: Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: the impossibility of being Paretian. " Econometrica, Vol. 71-5 (2003), pp.1557-1563.

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00458

Google Scholar

[2] Bossert, W., Y. Sprumont, and K. Suzumura: Ordering infinite utility streams. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 135-1 (2007), pp.579-589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2006.03.005

Google Scholar

[3] Chichilnisky, G: An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Social choice and welfare, Vol. 13-2 (1996), pp.231-257.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00183353

Google Scholar

[4] Chichilnisky, G: What Is Sustainable Development? Land Economics, Vol. 73-4 (1997), pp.467-491.

Google Scholar

[5] Chichilnisky, G: An axiomatic approach to choice under uncertainty with catastrophic risks. Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 22-3 (2006), pp.221-231.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(00)00032-4

Google Scholar

[6] Fleurbaey, M: Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 39-7 (2003), pp.777-802.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4068(03)00054-5

Google Scholar

[7] Frankowska, H: Optimal Control under State Constraints. International Congress of Mathematicians, (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Hartl, R. F. and S. P. Sethi: A survey of the maximum principles for optimal control problems with state constraints. SIAM review, Vol. 37-2 (1995), pp.181-218.

DOI: 10.1137/1037043

Google Scholar

[9] Lauwers, L: Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 46-1 (2010), 32-37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2009.06.007

Google Scholar

[10] Parson, E.A. The Big One : A Review of Richard Posner's Catastrophe: Risk and Response. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 45-1 (2007), pp.147-164.

DOI: 10.1257/jel.45.1.147

Google Scholar

[11] Weitzman, M. L: On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 91-1 (2009), pp.1-19.

DOI: 10.1162/rest.91.1.1

Google Scholar