Index System and Model of Evaluation to Implemented Performance of Patent Strategy from Perspective of Sustainable Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

The implemented performance of enterprise’s patent strategy is an important component to measure its comprehensive benefits. It is of strategic significance for an enterprise to evaluate objectively its implemented performance of patent strategy. From the perspective of sustainable development, according to the 4 aspects of creation, application, protection and management of patent, the essay constitutes preliminarily a comprehensive evaluation index system of the implemented performance of enterprise’s patent strategy which is composed of a set of 21 indexes on the basis of an amount of domestic and foreign literature survey, case study and expert consultation, and analyzes the evaluation model and method of implemented performance of enterprise’s patent strategy with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and through a real case. The essay thinks the constitution of evaluation index system should obey a series of basic principles of objectivity, systematization, science and conciseness and the evaluation in essence is multi-object, multi-factor and multi-layer. Therefore, it is effective and feasible to select the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

2852-2856

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hongli Liang, Junchao Hao, A framework for evaluating the performance of the national innovation system, J. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 1 (2014) 5-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Angus C. Chu, Charles K.Y. Leung, Edward Tang, Intellectual property rights, technical progress and the volatility of economic growth, J. Macroeconomics, 34 (2012) 749-756.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.04.002

Google Scholar

[3] Kim Y.K., Lee K., Park W.G., Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth, J. Research Policy, 41 (2012) 358-375.

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.003

Google Scholar

[4] Hua He, Reports on Patent and Industry Development, Intellectual Property Press, Beijing, (2013).

Google Scholar

[5] Qirong Guan, Suggestions of improving patent implementation, Intellectual Property, 10 (2013), 21.

Google Scholar

[6] Chonglin Yang, Zhijin Xu, Sustainable wealth accounting, J. Capital Normal University, 6(2012), 9.

Google Scholar

[7] Peizhuang Wang, Introduction of fuzzy mathematics, J. Understanding and Practice of Mathematics, 2 (1980) 9-16.

Google Scholar

[8] Jun Wang, Research of risk management of BOT project, J. Value Engineering, 3 (2013) 21-28.

Google Scholar

[9] Xiaojing Hui, Wine classification and evaluation on fuzzy mathematics method, J. Understanding and Practice of Mathematics, 16 (2013) 25-32.

Google Scholar

[10] Weihang Za, Jie Zhang, The evaluation system of intellectual property strategy subject, J. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 15 (2011) 55-60.

Google Scholar