Comparative Analysis of Nitrate Removal in Sub-Surface Flow Constructed Wetlands by Different External Carbon Sources

Article Preview

Abstract:

External carbon sources provide additional nutrients that improve the efficiency of nitrate removal in constructed wetlands. Typha angustifolia L. were planted in four vertical subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Different external carbon sources were fed into the columns, to investigate and compare their treatment of nitrate in synthetic wastewater, with initial influent C/N ratio of 1:1. Wetland A (WA) with 50g wheat straw as external carbon source, wetland B (WB) with 50g woodchips, wetland C (WC) with additional 10mg/L glucose and wetland D (WD) without external carbon source to serve as the control, were used in the lab-scale experimental study. WA, WB, WC and WD within a period of 24 days, cumulatively removed 109.38mg/L, 93.75mg/L, 85.14mg/L, and 64.01mg/L nitrate, respectively, from the influent. The nitrate-nitrogen (NO3–N) removal efficiency as aided by the external carbon sources was in the order: wheat straw > woodchips > glucose > control. Wheat straw treated 93% NO3–N, woodchips 78%, glucose 72% and the control 53%. The results indicate that WA, WB and WC outperformed the control system, due to the additional carbon sources. In general, the wheat straw had a better performance than wood chips and glucose. Thus, wheat straw as low cost biological waste product is recommended for the treatment of nitrate in wetlands.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

779-783

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Chen, Y. Wen, J. Cheng, C. Xue, D. Yang, and Q. Zhou, Effects of dissolved oxygen on extracellular enzymes activities and transformation of carbon sources from plant biomass: implications for denitrification in constructed wetlands., Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, no. 3, p.2433–40, Feb. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.122

Google Scholar

[2] J. A. Camargo and A. Alonso, Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment., Environ. Int., vol. 32, no. 6, p.831–49, Aug. (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002

Google Scholar

[3] M. P. Tjatji, Woodchips as carbon and energy source for denitrification, no. March, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] H. L. Leverenz, K. Haunschild, G. Hopes, G. Tchobanoglous, and J. L. Darby, Anoxic treatment wetlands for denitrification, Ecol. Eng., vol. 36, no. 11, p.1544–1551, Nov. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.014

Google Scholar

[5] M. Ms, O. Ca, S. Fm, and F. Bux, Constructed wetlands : A future alternative wastewater treatment technology, vol. 12, no. 29, p.4542–4553, (2013).

DOI: 10.5897/ajb2013.12978

Google Scholar

[6] T. S. Jamieson, G. W. Stratton, R. Gordon, and A. Madani, The use of aeration to enhance ammonia nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands, no. 3, p.9–14, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Wen, Y. Chen, N. Zheng, D. Yang, and Q. Zhou, Effects of plant biomass on nitrate removal and transformation of carbon sources in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands., Bioresour. Technol., vol. 101, no. 19, p.7286–92, Oct. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.068

Google Scholar

[8] L. U. Songliu, H. U. Hongying, S. U. N. Yingxue, and Y. Jia, Effect of carbon source on the denitrification in constructed wetlands, J. Environ. Sci., vol. 21, p.1036–1043, (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] L. a. Schipper, W. D. Robertson, A. J. Gold, D. B. Jaynes, and S. C. Cameron, Denitrifying bioreactors—An approach for reducing nitrate loads to receiving waters, Ecol. Eng., vol. 36, no. 11, p.1532–1543, Nov. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.008

Google Scholar

[10] S. Warneke, L. a Schipper, M. G. Matiasek, K. M. Scow, S. Cameron, D. a Bruesewitz, and I. R. McDonald, Nitrate removal, communities of denitrifiers and adverse effects in different carbon substrates for use in denitrification beds., Water Res., vol. 45, no. 17, p.5463–75, Nov. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.007

Google Scholar

[11] C. S. Srinandan, G. D'souza, N. Srivastava, B. B. Nayak, and A. S. Nerurkar, Carbon sources influence the nitrate removal activity, community structure and biofilm architecture., Bioresour. Technol., vol. 117, p.292–9, Aug. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.079

Google Scholar

[12] W. J. B. Saliling, P. W. Westerman, and T. M. Losordo, Wood chips and wheat straw as alternative biofilter media for denitrification reactors treating aquaculture and other wastewaters with high nitrate concentrations, Aquac. Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, p.222–233, Nov. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.06.003

Google Scholar