Research on Sand-Blocking Mechanism of Fence Based on CFD Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

The airflow field and sand movement path around fences of 0 and 40% porosity are of numerical calculation by CFD technology and the sand-blocking mechanism of fence is analyzed comprehensively. The results show that the two preconditions for the good sand-blocking performance of fence are to greatly reduce the coming wind velocity and form a large weak wind velocity area, and ensure the sand movement path in the weak wind velocity area. The numerical simulation research of the sand-blocking mechanism of fence is an useful supplement of traditional experimental research and of reference significance in further understanding the dynamic mechanism of fence protection.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1092-1093)

Pages:

1283-1288

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Comelis W M, Gabriels D. Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2005, 61: 315-332.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.005

Google Scholar

[2] Schwartz R C, Fryrear D W, Harris B L, et al. Mean flow and shearstress distributions as influenced by vegetative windbreak structure[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1995, 75: 1-22.

DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(94)02206-y

Google Scholar

[3] Lee S J, Park K C, Park K W. Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2002, 36: 1453-1463.

DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00578-7

Google Scholar

[4] Park C W, Lee S J. Experimental study on surface pressure and flow structure around a triangular prism located hehind a porous fence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91: 156-184.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00343-4

Google Scholar

[5] Parkwood A R. Flow through porous fences in thick boundary layers: comparisons between laboratory and mumerical experiments[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 88: 75-90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(00)00025-8

Google Scholar

[6] Vigiak O, Sterk G, Warren A. Spatial modeling of wind speed around windbreaks[J]. Catena, 2003, 53: 273-288.

DOI: 10.1016/s0341-8162(03)00018-3

Google Scholar

[7] Perera M D A E S. Shelter behind two-dimensional solid and porous fences[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1981, 8: 93-104.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(81)90010-6

Google Scholar

[8] Loeffler A E, Gordon A M, Gillespie T J. Optical porosity and wind speed reduction by coniferous windbreaks in southern Ontario[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 1992, 17: 119-133.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00053117

Google Scholar

[9] Wilson J D. A field study of the mean pressure about a windbreak[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1997, 85: 327-358.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1000582917218

Google Scholar

[10] Lee S J, Kim H B. Velocity field measurements of flow around a triangular prism behind a porous fence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 77/78: 521-530.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00169-x

Google Scholar

[11] Lee S J, Park C W. Surface pressure characteristics on a triangular prism located behind a porous fence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 80: 69-83.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00195-0

Google Scholar

[12] Kawamura R. Study on sand movement by wind[J]. Science & Techno-logy, 1951, 5: 95-112.

Google Scholar

[13] H Zhang, Brandle J R, Hodges L, et al. The relationship between open windspeed and windspeed reduction in shelter[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 1995, 32: 297-311.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00711717

Google Scholar

[14] Wanyin Luo, Zhibao Dong, Guangqiang Qian, et al. Wind tunnel simulation on the wind velocity decrement around porous fence. Journal of Desert Research, 2010, 30(1): 1-7.

Google Scholar

[15] D Guan, Y Zhang, T Zhu. A wind-tunnel study of windbreak drag[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2003, 118: 75-84.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(03)00069-8

Google Scholar

[16] Hagen L J, Skidmore E L. Windbreak drag as influenced by porosity[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1971, 14: 464-465.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.38315

Google Scholar

[17] Wilson J D. Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1985, 119-154.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(85)90001-7

Google Scholar

[18] Siginer I D O. Windbreak drag calculated from the horizontal velocity field[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1972, 3: 87-97.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00769109

Google Scholar

[19] Lee S J, Kim H B. Velocity field measurements of flow around a triangular prism behind aporous fence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 521-530.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00169-x

Google Scholar

[20] Lee S J, Park C W. Surface pressure characteristics on a triangular prism located behind a porous fence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 69-83.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00195-0

Google Scholar

[21] Wanyin Luo, Zhibao Dong, Guangqiang Qian, et al. Wind tunnel simulation on the flow characteristics around upright fences. Journal of Desert Research, 2009, 29 (2): 200-205, in Chinese.

Google Scholar