Comparative Analysis of Several Transmission Pricing Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper analyses several common transmission pricing methods of marginal cost and embedded cost deeply. It analyses pricing models of several transmission pricing methods, long-run marginal cost (LRMC) method, MW-Mile method, sensitivity method, flow tracing method, contract path method and stamp method. It also gives a comprehensive comparison of characteristics and limitations of these pricing methods, discusses their applicable conditions in aspects of fairness, economic, financial balance, transparency, operability and others, and makes a quantitative research of comparison based on a case, and verifies the results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1092-1093)

Pages:

418-423

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ren Zhen, Wu Guobing. Research on power transmission on the electricity market[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2003, 27(1): 20-26.

Google Scholar

[2] Tan Zhongfu, GuoLianzhe, LiXiaojun, et al. Theoryand method oftransmission pricingin electricitymarketsand lessonstoChina[J]. Electric Power, 2007, 40(6): 51-55.

Google Scholar

[3] Yuan Zhiqiang, HouZhijian, Jiang Chuanwen, et al. Introduction of transmission service pricing[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2003, 23(10): 81-86.

Google Scholar

[4] Lima J W M. Allocation of transmission fixed charges: an overview[J]. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 1996, 11(3): 1409-1418.

DOI: 10.1109/59.535682

Google Scholar

[5] Happ H H. Cost of wheeling methodologies[J]. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 1994, 9(1): 147-156.

DOI: 10.1109/59.317547

Google Scholar

[6] Sun Liying, Zhou Ming, Li Gengyin. Study on transmission charge allocation in power markets[J]. Electric Power Scienceand Engineering, 2004 (4): 36-39.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhao Minglu, Zhao Huiru, Qi Jianxun. Study on pricing methods of electrical power transmission and distribution[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University, 2003, 30(4): 54-57.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang Ruiyou, Han Shui, Zhang Jinzhu, et al. A Kind of Transmission Pricing Approach for Power Market in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(4): 78-82.

DOI: 10.1109/tdc.2005.1546999

Google Scholar

[9] Li F, Tolley D L. Long-run incremental cost pricing based on unused capacity[J]. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2007, 22(4): 1683-1689.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2007.908469

Google Scholar

[10] Xie Kai, Song Yonghua. Transmission in services in electricity market(4): allocation of transmission of charges[J]. Power System Technology, 1997, 21(7): 65-68.

Google Scholar

[11] Wang Gongtao, Fu Shuti. Allocation of transmission of charges using load flow tracing method[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2004, 28(9): 25-27.

Google Scholar

[12] Ma Ling, XieKaigui, Zhou Jiaqi, et al. A survey of power flow tracing algorithm[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2004, 27(7): 45-49.

Google Scholar

[13] Bialek J W, Ziemianek S, Abi-Samra N. Tracking-based loss allocation and economic dispatch[C]/Proceedings of the 13th Power Systems Computation Conference. 1999: 375-381.

Google Scholar

[14] Conejo A J, et al. Zbus transmission network cost allocation[J]. IEEE Trans. Power Syst, 2007, 22(1): 342-349.

Google Scholar

[15] Tsukamoto Y, Iyoda I. Allocation of fixed transmission cost to wheeling transactions by cooperative game theory[J]. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 1996, 11(2): 620-629.

DOI: 10.1109/59.496131

Google Scholar