Nickel Release Rate of Type 303 Free Cutting Austenitic Stainless Steel

Abstract:

Type 303 austenitic stainless steel has been applied in jewelry production, and its nickel release rate has become a concerned issue in the jewelry industry. In this paper, the commercial type 303 stainless steel was used as the test material, while 304 stainless steel as the contrast material; their nickel release rates and corrosion behaviors in artificial sweat were studied. The results show that the actually measured nickel release rate of 303 stainless steel reaches 2.06μg/cm²/week, nearly 25 times higher than that of 304 stainless steel, which exceeds the threshold specified in nickel release standard EN1811:2011 for jewelries coming into direct and prolonged contact with the skin (0.88μg/cm²/week), and its adjusted value also exceeds the threshold specified in Nickel Directive 2004/96/EC for puncture accessories (0.35μg/cm²/week). The high nickel release rate for 303 stainless steel is mainly caused by its high sulfur content and the inevitable formation of manganese sulfide inclusions, which will cause the pitting and exacerbate the material corrosion. Considering the risk of nickel sensitization of 303 stainless steel, it is not suggested to use 303 stainless steel as the jewelry material, especially for piercing jewelry.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1096)
• Pages: 114-119
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1096.114
• Online since: April 2015
• Authors: Jun Ping Yuan*, De Dong Chen, Hai Rui Bo
• Keywords: 303 Stainless Steel, Jewelry, Nickel Allergy, Nickel Release Rate, Pitting

References

[1] Yuan Junping, Wang Chang. Fashion Jewelry Materials and Manufacturing Technology[M]. Wu Han: China University of Geosciences Press. (in Chinese).

[2] Yuan Junping, Li Wei, Wang Chang. Study of Nickel Release of 10K white gold alloy for jewelry, Rare Metal Material & Engineering. 2012, 41(6): 947-951.

DOI: 10.1016/s1875-5372(12)60050-2

[3] JP. Menné Torkil. Metal Allergy-A Review on Exposures, Penetration, Genetics, Prevalence, and Clinical Implications [J]. Chemical research in toxicology, 2010, 23: 309-318.

DOI: 10.1021/tx9002726

[4] European Communities. European Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of dangerous substances [J]. Official Journal of the European communities, 1994, 37: 1-2.

DOI: 10.5040/9781472559500.0009

[5] EN1811: 1998. Reference test method for release of nickel from products intended to come into direct prolonged contact with the skin [S]. Brussel: European Committee for standardization, (1998).

DOI: 10.3403/01556668

[6] The Commission of European Communities. Commission Directive 2004/96/EC of 27 September 2004 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of nickel for piercing post assemblies for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress [J]. Official Journal of the European Union, 2004, 301: 51-52.

[7] EN 1811: 1998+A1: 2008. Reference test method for release of nickel from products intended to come into direct and prolonged contact with the skin [S]. Brussel: European Committee for standardization, (2008).

DOI: 10.3403/01556668

[8] EN 1811: 2011. Reference test method for release of nickel from all post assemblies which are inserted into pierced parts of the human body and articles intended to come into direct and prolonged contact with the skin [S]. Brussel: European Committee for standardization, (2011).

DOI: 10.3403/30442100

[9] Nestor Perez, translated by Zhu Yoingchun, Cao Zhongqiu, Electrochemistry and Corrosion Science [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2013. 4.

[10] Aya Chiba, Izumi Muto, et al. A Microelectrochemical System for In Situ High-Resolution Optical Microscoty: Morphological Characteristics of Pitting at MnS Inclusion in Stainless Steel. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(8): 341-350.

DOI: 10.1149/2.054208jes

[11] Soon-Hyeok Jeon, Soon-Tae Kim, In-Sung Lee, et al. Effects of sulfur addition on pitting corrosion and machinability behavior of super duplex stainless steel containing rare earth metals: Part 2[J]. Corrosion Science, 2010, 52(10): 3537-3547.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.002

[12] J.H. Cleland. What does the pitting resistance equivalent really tell us?[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 1996, 3(1): 65-69.

DOI: 10.1016/1350-6307(95)00026-7

[13] Wu Jiu, Duplex Stainless Steel (Second Edition) [M]. Beijing, Metallurgical Industry Press, 1999. ( in Chinese).

[14] Aya Chiba, Izumi Muto, Yu Sugawara, et al. Pit Initiation Mechanism at MnS Inclusions in Stainless Steel: Synergistic Effect of Elemental Sulfur and Chloride Ions [J]. Journal of Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160(10): 511-520.

DOI: 10.1149/2.081310jes