Influence of Phase Shift and Amplitude Ratio on the Principal Stresses and Directions in Multiaxial Fatigue Testing

Article Preview

Abstract:

The maximum values of normal and shear stresses are the basic parameters which influence directly the initiation and propagation of multiaxial fatigue cracks.Based on the above, the first part of the paper presents an analysis of principal stresses (normal and shear) in case of symmetrical tension-compression loadings with superimposed phase-shifted symmetrical torsion cycles. The influence of stress amplitude ratio and phase shift on the maximum (normal and shear) stresses and on the directions of the planes along which these act is analyzed and graphically represented using stress hodographs.The second part of the paper highlights the possibility of using the maximum value of the normal or shear stress as base parameter for durability studies under multiaxial fatigue, based on existing experimental data. The mentioned data is correlated with the results of an original experimental program carried out by the authors on 41Cr4 steel and conclusions are formulated with regard to the role of maximum shear stress in life-time calculation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

103-109

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Nicholas, High Cycle Fatigue – A Mechanics of Materials Perspective, Elsevier, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] I. Dumitru, The basics of fatigue calculation, Eurostampa Publishing House, 2009 (in Romanian).

Google Scholar

[3] Quoc Huy Vu, Fatigue polycyclique multiaxiale de l'acier C35: caracterisation et modelisation des mecanisms d'endommagement, PhD Thesis, University of Poitiers, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] C.C. Chu, F.A. Conle, F.F.A. Bonnen, Multiaxial stress-strain modeling and fatigue life prediction of SAE axle shafts, Advances in Multiaxial Fatigue, ASTM STP 1191, 1993, pp.37-54.

DOI: 10.1520/stp24794s

Google Scholar

[5] I.V. Papadopoulos, Critical plane approaches in high-cycle fatigue: On the definition of the amplitude and mean value of the shear stress acting on the critical plane, Fat & Fract Eng Mat & Struct 21 (1998) 269-285.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00459.x

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Verreman, H. Guo, High-cycle fatigue mechanisms in 1045 steel under non-proportional axial-torsional loading, Fat & Fract. Eng. Mat. & Struct. 30 (2007) 932-946.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01164.x

Google Scholar

[7] L. Reis, B. Li, M. de Freitas, Analytical and experimental studies on fatigue crack path under complex multi-axial loading, Fat & Fract. Eng. Mat. & Struct, 29 (2006) 281–289.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01001.x

Google Scholar

[8] A. Karolczuk, E. Macha, A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials, Int. J. Fract., 134 (2005) 267-304.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-005-1088-2

Google Scholar

[9] A. Chamat, M. Abbadi, J. Gilgert, F. Cocheteux, Z. Azari, A new non-local criterion in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue for non-proportional loadings, Int. J. Fat. 29 (2007) 1465-1474.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.033

Google Scholar

[10] J. Papuga, M. Ruzicka, Analysis of present criteria for damage description caused by multiaxial loading, Report No. 2051/01/4, 2002, Technical University of Prague.

Google Scholar

[11] I. Dumitru, L. Kun, M. Sava, M. Hluscu, Considerations on the necessity of determining principal stresses and directions for analysis of material durability under multiaxial fatigue, Key Eng Mater, vol. 601 (2014) 17-20.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.601.17

Google Scholar

[12] D. Skibicki, Experimental verification of fatigue loading nonproportionality model, J. Theoret. Appl. Mech., 45(2) (2007) 337-448.

Google Scholar

[13] L. Kun, Modeling and Simulation of Multiaxial Fatigue, PhD Thesis, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania, 2012 (in Romanian).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Lee, A criterion for fully reversed out-of-phase torsion and bending, in: K. Miller, M. Brown (Eds. ), Multiaxial Fatigue, ASTM International., Philadelphia, 1985, pp.553-568.

DOI: 10.1520/stp36242s

Google Scholar

[15] L. Susmel, N. Petrone, Multiaxial fatigue estimations for 6082-T6 cyclindrical specimens under in-phase and out-of-phase biaxial loadings, in: A. Carpinteri et. al. (Eds. ), Biaxial and Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture, ESIS, 2002, pp.83-104.

DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(03)80006-7

Google Scholar

[16] C. Braccesi, F. Cianetti, G. Lori, D. Pioli, An equivalent uniaxial stress process for fatigue life prediction of mechanical components under multiaxial stress conditions, Int. J. Fat 30 (2008) 1479-1497.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.09.011

Google Scholar