Optimal Low Carbon Cement Plant via Co-Processing Measure

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cement industry is one of the highest contributor in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. With that, this paper proposes the development of a systematic optimization model where minimized production cost is anticipated within the CO2 reduction target and fuels mixture. The optimization models consider co-processing measures which replaces parts of carbon rich fuels with lower carbon fuels in order to achieve lower carbon emissions. The proposed models are executed using General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). With highest carbon reduction of 3.2%, the minimum manufacturing cost went from €59.748/t clinker for a 0% carbon reduction target to €65.737/t clinker.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

812-817

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Stefanović., G. M., Vučković, G. D., Stojiljković, M. M., and Trifunović, M. B. (2010). CO2 Reduction Options in Cement Industry, Therm. Sci. Vol. 14, No. 3, p.671 – 679.

Google Scholar

[2] Hendriks, C. A., Worrell, E., Jager, D., Blok, K., and Riemer, P. (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Mokrzycki, E., and Bocheńczyk, A. U. (2003). Alternative fuels for the cement industry, Applied Energy, 74, p.95 – 100.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-2619(02)00135-6

Google Scholar

[4] Kookos, I. K., Pontikes, Y., Angelopoulos, G. N., and Lyberatos, G. (2011). Classical and alternative fuel mix optimization in cement production using mathematical programming, Fuel, Vol. 90, Issue 3, March 2011, p.1277 – 1284.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.016

Google Scholar

[5] Carpio, R. C., Junior, F. S., Coelho, L. S., and Silva, R. J. (2008). Alternative fuels mixture in cement industry kiln employing particle swarm optimization algorithm, Journ. of the Brazil Society of Mechanical Sci. and Eng., No 4, p.335 – 340.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782008000400010

Google Scholar

[6] Kääntee, U., Zevenhovenb, R., Backmanc, R., and Hupac M. (2004). Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modeling, Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 85, Issue 4, p.293 – 301.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(03)00203-0

Google Scholar

[7] Conesa, J. A., Gálvez, A., Mateos, F., Martín-Gullón, I., and Font, R. (2008). Organic and inorganic pollutants from cement kiln stack feeding alternative fuels, Journ. of Hazardous Materials, 158, p.585 – 592.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.116

Google Scholar

[8] Schuhmacher, M., Nadal, M., and Domingo, J. L. (2009). Environmental monitoring of PCDD/Fs and metals in the vicinity of a cement plant after using sewage sludge as a secondary fuel, Chemosphere, 74, p.1502 – 1508.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.055

Google Scholar

[9] Tokheim, L. A. (1999). The impact of staged combustion on theoperation of a precalciner cement kiln, Doctor Philosophy, Telemark University College, Norway.

Google Scholar

[10] U.S. Geological Survey, 2012. Mineral commodity summaries 2012. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S. Geological Survey.

Google Scholar

[11] Willett, J. C. (2011). 2010 Minerals Yearbook: STONE, CRUSHED, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.

Google Scholar

[12] Moya, J. A., Pardo, N., and Mercier, A. (2010). Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions: Prospective Scenarios for the Cement Industry, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] Murray, A., and Price, L. (2008). Use of Alternative Fuels in Cement Manufacture: Analysis of Fuel Characteristics and Feasibility for Use in the Chinese Cement Sector, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Google Scholar