Innovation on Environmental Management Systems towards Firms’ Eco-Efficiency for Malaysia Polypropylene Industries

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the findings of a research that examined eco-efficiency on ISO14000 certified polypropylene firms. Polypropylene poses pollution threat to air, water and landfill due to its non-biodegradable products. Polypropylene firms are expected to demonstrate continual improvements in their environmental performances, objectives and targets, controls on environmental impacts and promote best practices. Environmental programs and innovations are needed not only for eco-efficiency and environmental performances, but also to comply with the global and market pressures towards sustainable green technology and businesses. Findings of the research revealed that employees’ involvements, innovations integration in the production systems towards eco-efficient production processes, producing substituted environmentally-friendly products, minimization of wastes and reducing environmental impacts are crucial for polypropylene industries in Malaysia. Additionally, organizational compliances towards government regulations and corporate social responsibility have implications on EMS and organizational performances towards green technology and business sustainability. In conclusion, innovations in EMS support eco-efficiencies in polypropylene industries and simultaneously protect the environment for future generation

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

833-840

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Coglianese, C., & Nash, J., (Eds. ), (2001). Regulating from the inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals. Washington. RFF Press.

DOI: 10.1017/s1466046602210145

Google Scholar

[2] Porter and Van der Linde (1995). America's Green Strategy. Business and the Environment. Washington DC.

Google Scholar

[3] Utting, P. (ed. ) (2002a) The Greening of Business in Developing Countries: Rhetoric, Reality and Prospects, London: Zed Books.

Google Scholar

[4] Albino, (2012). The Effect of the adoption of environmental strategies on green product development: A Study of companies on world sustainability indices. International Journal of Management. 29(2): 525-538.

Google Scholar

[5] Griffith, D.A., Cavusgil, S.T. and Xu, S. (2008). Emerging themes in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol. 39.

Google Scholar

[6] Dyllick T, Hockerts K. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11(2): 130–141.

DOI: 10.1002/bse.323

Google Scholar

[7] Tornatzky and M. Fleischer (1990). The process of technological innovation. Business & Economics. Industrial Management.

Google Scholar

[8] Rothwell, R., Robertson, A.B., 1973. The role of communications in technological innovations. Res. Policy 2.

Google Scholar

[9] Kolk, A. (2000). Economics of Environmental Management. Financial Times/Prentice-Hall London.

Google Scholar

[10] Darnall, N., Seol, I. and Sarkis, J. (2009). Perceived stakeholder influences and organisations' use of environmental audits. Accounting Organisations and Society, Vol. 34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.07.002

Google Scholar

[11] Bragg, S., Knapp, P. and Whitaker, B.D. (1994). Improving Environmental Performance: A Guide to a Proven and Effective Approach. Technical Communications (Publishing) Ltd, Sydney.

Google Scholar

[12] Prakash, A. & Potoski, M. (2012). Voluntary environmental programs: a comparative perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 31(1): 123-138.

DOI: 10.1002/pam.20617

Google Scholar

[13] Murty, M.N. and Surender Kumar (2002). Measuring cost of environmentally sustainable industrial development in India: a distance function approach. Environment and Development Economics. (7). 467–86.

DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x02000281

Google Scholar

[14] Rondinelli, D.A. and Vastag, G. (2000). Panacea common sense or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal, Vol. 18.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-2373(00)00039-6

Google Scholar

[15] Hertin, Julia, and F Berkhout. 2003. Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration : The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 5(1). 39-56.

DOI: 10.1080/15239080305603

Google Scholar

[16] Welch, L.S., Benito, G. R. G., Petersen, B. (2007). Foreign operation methods. Cheltenham: UK.

Google Scholar

[17] Hart, S.L. 1995, Natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review. 20(4).

Google Scholar

[18] Shrivastava, P. and Hart, S. (2000). Greening organizations – 2000. International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 17. Thompson Executive Press.

Google Scholar

[19] Meyer, A.S., Hinings, C.R., (1993). Guest co-editors' introduction: configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academic Management Journal. 36.

Google Scholar

[20] Dean, J W (1987).

Google Scholar

[21] Van de Ven, A H; Polley D E; Garud, R and Venkatarum, S (1999). The Innovation Journey. New York. Oxford University Press, 422.

Google Scholar

[22] Abrahamson, E (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review 21: 254-285.

Google Scholar

[23] Gopalakrishnan, S., Damanpour, F. (1994). Patterns of generation and adoption of innovations in organizations: contingency models of innovation attributes. Journal of Engineering Technology and Management.

DOI: 10.1016/0923-4748(94)90001-9

Google Scholar

[24] Wolfe, R.A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies 31(3): 405-431.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x

Google Scholar

[25] Smith, D.J. (2007). The politics of innovation: Why innovations need a godfather., Technovation 27: 95-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.05.001

Google Scholar

[26] Tidd, J. (2006) From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence: Measuring technological, market and organizational innovation, (Imperial College Press).

DOI: 10.1142/p162

Google Scholar

[27] Pataki DE, Alig RJ, Fung AS, Golubiewski NE, Kennedy CA, McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Pouyat RV, Lankao PR. (2006). Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology. 12: 1-11.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01242.x

Google Scholar

[28] Sarkis, J. (2003). Corporate environmental benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 10.

Google Scholar

[29] Roediger-Schluga, T. (2004). The Porter Hypothesis and the Economic Consequences of Environmental Regulation: A Neo-Schumpeterian Approach. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.

DOI: 10.1002/eet.363

Google Scholar

[30] Chintrakarn, P, 92008) Environmental regulation and U.S. states' technical inefficiency, Economics letters. - Amsterdam Elsevier.

Google Scholar

[31] Shadbegian, Ronald J., Wayne B. Gray, and Jonathan Levy (2000). Spatial Efficiency of Pollution.

Google Scholar

[32] Filbeck, G. & Raymond Gorman (2004). The Relationship between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities, " Environmental & Resource Economics. European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. 29(2). 137-157.

DOI: 10.1023/b:eare.0000044602.86367.ff

Google Scholar

[33] Telle, Kjetil & Larsson, Jan (2007). Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants' environmental performance can change the conclusion. Ecological Economics. Elsevier. 61(2-3), 438-445.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.015

Google Scholar

[34] European Commission (2001). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility – Green Paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.

Google Scholar

[35] Matten, D. and Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Toward and Extended Theoretical Conceptualization. Academy of Management Review. 30(1). 166-179.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2005.15281448

Google Scholar

[36] Valor, C. (2005). CSR and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review. 110(2). 191–212.

DOI: 10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00011.x

Google Scholar

[37] Kerlinger (1986); Carmines and Zeller (1979). Researching research management. Quoted in Business & Economics. Christer Karlsson (2008).

Google Scholar

[38] Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[39] Saraph, J.V., Benson, G.P., Schroeder, R.G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences. (20).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x

Google Scholar

[40] Zhang, Z., Waszink, A., Wijngaard, J. (2000). An instrument for measuring TQM implementation for Chinese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 17(7). 730-55.

DOI: 10.1108/02656710010315247

Google Scholar