Adoption and Adaptation of Japanese Manufacturing Management in an Automotive Company of Malaysia

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper discusses the practices associated with Japanese Manufacturing Management (JMM) which can yield a superior competitive advantage in terms of productivity, quality and provide overall successful business performance. To examine the transfer of the best practices of the JMM locally and obtain the impact of the adoption and adaptation of the JMM, an in-depth case study was conducted in a Malaysian automotive company. This paper also discusses the changes in terms of the philosophy and practices undertaken by the automotive company and ascertain the impact of the JMM on its manufacturing and financial performances. The elements of business performance from the viewpoint of manufacturing based on safety, quality, cost and delivery were quantified and examined. All elements were quantified since the first year of the adoption and viewed over time to track the trend of achievement. The results show a positive impact to the automotive plant manufacturing performance. The results of the financial performance also show the profitability of the plant. The revenue has increased up to 92% after the JMM adoption whilst the net profit has increased from 5.33% to 8.15%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

589-595

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Krisher, Toyota Now Top Selling Automaker, Claims Title From GM. Huff Post Business, (2012), Retrieved March 2013. http: /www. huffingtonpost. com/2013/01/14/toyota-top-selling-automakern_2471068. html.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Dawson, Toyota Takes Top Car-Maker Title Back from GM. Wall Street Journal, (2013) Retrieved March 2013, http: /blogs. wsj. com/drivers-seat/2013/01/28/toyota-takes-top-car-maker-title-back-from-gm.

Google Scholar

[3] A. L. Bergenwall, C. Chen and R. E. White, TPS's process design in American Automotive Plants and its Effects on the Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1) (2012) 374-384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.016

Google Scholar

[4] R. Shah and P.T. Ward, Lean Manufacturing: Context, Practice Bundles, and performance, Journal of Operation Management, 21 (2003) 129-149.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0

Google Scholar

[5] R. R. Fullerton, C. S. McWatters, and C. Fawson, An Examination of the Relationship Between JIT and Financial Performance, Journal of Operations Management, 21(4) (2003) 383-404.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6963(03)00002-0

Google Scholar

[6] T. Laosirihongthong, M. W. McLean, P. Leabsuetrakool, T. Chongjareonjai, and S. Leedhirakul, Technology Strategy: Findings from Adoption and Adaptation of Japanese Manufacturing Management (JMM) to ASEAN and Australasian Automotive Manufacturers, 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/icmit.2008.4654563

Google Scholar

[7] R. J. Schonberger, Japanese Production Management: An Evolution-With Mixed Success, Journal of Operations Management, 25(2) (2007) 403-419.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.003

Google Scholar

[8] F. K. Pil, Thrive: Managing the Transfer of Best Practice, at Japanese Auto Plants in North America, Journal of World Business, 34(4) (2000) 372-390.

DOI: 10.1016/s1090-9516(99)00024-3

Google Scholar

[9] M. Nakamura, S. Sakakibara and R. Schroeder, Adoption of Just-in-Time Manufacturing Methods at US and Japanese Owned Plants: Some Empirical Evidence, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(3) (1998) 230-240.

DOI: 10.1109/17.704245

Google Scholar

[10] A. C. Phan, A. B. Abdallah and Y. Matsui, Quality Management Practices and Competitive Performance: Empirical Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2) (2011) 518-529.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.024

Google Scholar