Degradation of Ametryn in Aqueous Solution by Solar/ S-Doped Titanium Dioxide Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The removal efficiency of ametryn in water and the influencing factors by the combined process of solar irradiation and S-doped TiO2 were studied in detail, in which S-doped TiO2 photo-catalyst with high sunlight activity was prepared by acid catalyzed hydrolysis method with thiourea as sulfur source; As a comparison, solar/TiO2 process was studied in the meantime; The experiment results showed that ametryn could be more effectively oxidized by the solar/S-doped TiO2 process than the solar/ TiO2 one, while the removal efficiency of 60% and 40% respectively after 30 min’s irradiation; Pseudo-first-order model could be used to simulate the oxidation process in which the degradation rate coefficients were independent of the initial concentration of ametryn; Degradation rate could be greatly affected by the concentration of H2O2, the optimum concentration for the system of solar/S-doped TiO2 was found to be 20mg/L, which was 5mg/L higher than that of solar/TiO2 system; Lower water pH favored the degradation of ametryn for the change of charge density of both the ametryn molecular and photo-catalyst surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

1375-1378

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Farre, J. Fernandez, M. Paez, L. Granada, L. (2002) Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 373, 704-709.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Yang, Y. Chun, G. Shang, G. (2004) Langmuir 20, 6736-6741.

Google Scholar

[3] Nai-yun Gao, Yang Deng, Dandan Zhao. Journal of Hazardous Materials, in press.

Google Scholar

[4] Ao C. H., Leung M. K. H., Lam R. C. W., et al. 2007) Chemical Engineering, 129, 153-159.

Google Scholar

[5] S.X. Liu, X.Y. Chen, X. Chen. (2006) Chin. J. Catal. 27, 697-702.

Google Scholar

[6] Shouxin Liu, Xiaoyun Chen. (2008) J of Hazardous Materials. 152, 48-55.

Google Scholar

[7] Shephard GS, Stockenstr . om S, De Villiers D, et al. (1998) Toxicon. 36, 1895-(1901).

Google Scholar

[8] Coleman H M., Vimonses V., Lelie G. (2007) Journal of Hazardous Materials, 146, 496-501.

Google Scholar

[9] Malato S., Blanco J., Maldonado M.I. Campos A. (2000) Appl. Catal., B, 28, 163-174.

Google Scholar

[10] Yang H., Zhang K., Shi R., et al. (2006) J. Alloys Compd. 413, 302-306.

Google Scholar

[11] Saritha P., Aparna C., Himabindu V. Journal of Hzardous Materials, in press.

Google Scholar