Effect of External Carbon Source on Denitrification in Biofilter at Low Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to investigate the denitrification efficiency enhancement and to evaluate the denitrification potential at the condition of lower temperature. Three identical biofilter were operated in parallel at batch tests. Results showed that the denitrification potential can be substantially increased by addition of ethanol and hydrolysate of sludge as external carbon sources compared with raw sewage. The mean denitrification rates of ethanol and hydrolysate reached up to 0.058 and 0.08 mgN/(g MLVSS•h), respectively, while that of raw sewage was only 0.041 mgN/(g MLVSS•h). The denitrification potential increased respectively from 0.76 to 1.54 and 5.3 mg NO3-N/L owing to ethanol and hydrolysate addition. By comparison, hydrolysate of sludge was found to be the better carbon source for denitrification considering strengthening denitrification performance and price. This study provides evidence for external carbon sources choice of sewage plant and surplus sludge reutilization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

1358-1362

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Christensson, M., Lie, E., Welander, T., Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 30 (1994), p.83.

Google Scholar

[2] I. Bodík , A. Blštˇáková, S. Sedlácˇek, M. Hutnˇan, Bioresource Technology. Vol. 100 (2009), p.2452.

Google Scholar

[3] Ana Soaresa, Pantelis Kampas, Sarah Maillard, Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 175 (2010), p.733.

Google Scholar

[4] Anette Æsøy, Hallvard Ødegaard, Kristin Bach, Water Research. Vol 32(1998), p.1463.

Google Scholar

[5] Bodík, I., Drtil, M., Derco, J., Polish J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 4 (1995), p.5.

Google Scholar

[6] Sage, M., Daufin, G., Gésan-Guiziou, G., Water Res. Vol. 40 (2006), p.2747.

Google Scholar

[7] H.J. Hamlin , J.T. Michaels , C.M. Beaulaton , Aquacultural Engineering . Vol. 38 (2008) , p.79.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Elefsiniotis , D. Li, Biochemical Engineering Journal . Vol. 28 (2006), p.148.

Google Scholar

[9] Nyberg U, Aspergren H, Andersson B, et al. Wat Sci Tech. Vol. 26(1992), p.1077.

Google Scholar

[10] Lee S, Koopman B, Park S, et al. Water Environ Res. Vol. 67 (1995), p.1119.

Google Scholar

[11] Christensson M, Lie E, Welander T. Wat Sci Tech. Vol. 30(1994), p.83.

Google Scholar

[12] Andersson B, Aspergren H, Nyberg U, et al. Wat Sci Tech. Vol. 37(1998), p.175.

Google Scholar

[13] EPA of China, Water and Wastewater Analyzing Methods, 3rd ed., China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, (1989).

Google Scholar

[14] M. Sage, G. Daufin, G. Ge´san-Guiziou, Water Research. Vol. 40 (2006), p.2747.

Google Scholar

[15] Xue Tao, Huang Xia, HaoWang-juan, China Wat. and Wastewat. Vol. 22 (2006), p.22.

Google Scholar

[16] PENG Yong-zhen, MA Yong, WANG Shu-ying, Journal of Environmental Sciences. Vol. 19(2007), p.284.

Google Scholar

[17] Ana Soaresa, Pantelis Kampasa, Sarah Maillarda, et al. , Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 175 (2010) , p.733.

Google Scholar

[18] K.H. Ahn, K.Y. Park, S.K. Maeng, Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 46(2002) , p.71.

Google Scholar

[19] Ana Soaresa, Pantelis Kampas, Sarah Maillard, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 175 (2010), p.733.

Google Scholar