Cleaner Dehairing Technology for Goatskins: Effects of Hydrosulfide and Peroxide on Enzyme Unhairing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Traditional lime and sulfide dehairing process is a major source of the pollution, such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS) and toxic H2S gas, etc. Enzymatic dehairing process is known to be cleaner but its dehairing effects are unsatisfactory. Hence, an attempt has been made to solve those two unhairing methods’ disadvantages through a biochemical approach. Several commercial enzyme formulations were chosen to research effects of hydrosulfide and peroxide on its activities, and then hair-saving enzymatic unhairing experiments with those two reagents were conducted in paste and pile method more effectively and cleanly. Results show that activity of enzyme 2709 is stabilized by the addition of hydrosulfide through activity measurements; Peroxide has some activation effect on protease 3942. Hair removal is found to be complete using scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Those two processes enjoy a significant reduction in BOD, COD, TDS and TSS. The perfromances of the experimental leathers are also comparable to that of conventional ones. Therefore, those are cleaner processing technologies that could be chosen to solve traditional method’s disadvantage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

1726-1731

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. R. Yates: J Soc Leather Technol Chem; Vol. 56(1972), p.158.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Davighi: World Leather; January ( 1988); p.29.

Google Scholar

[3] A Dayanandan, J Kanagaraj and L Sounderraj, et al: J Cleaner Prodn Vol. 11(2003), p.533.

Google Scholar

[4] C. S. Cantera, A.R. Angelinetti and G. Altobelli, et al: J Soc Leather Technol Chem Vol. 80 (1996), p.83.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Thanikaivelan, J. R. Rao and B. U. Nair: J Soc Leather Technol Chem; Vol. 84(2000), p.276.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Saravanabhavan, P. Thanikaivelan and J. R. Rao, et al: Environ Sci Technol Vol. 39(2005), p.3776.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Bhavan, J. R. Rao and B. U. Nair: Environ Sci Pollut Res Vol. 15(2008), p.293.

Google Scholar

[8] M. L. Anson. J General Physiology Vol. 22(1938), p.79.

Google Scholar

[9] V. Virgilijus, B. Kęstutis and V. Violeta, et al: J Cleaner Prodn Vol. 17(2009), p.214.

Google Scholar