Bonding Quality of Fiber-Wood Interface with Wood Adhesives

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effects of fiber fabric type, glue spread, adhesive kind and angle between carbon fiber and wood grain on bonding quality of fiber-wood interface were investigated to make it clear whether wood adhesive can be used in fiber reinforced wood products. Four different kinds of fiber fabric were bonded into poplar sample with three different adhesives and three different glue spread. Shear strength of samples were measured by compression shear test. The results indicated that bonding quality of GFMa (Glass Fiber Mat)-wood interface was the best of all and 400g/mm2 was the optimal glue spread for various adhesive and adhesion. Results of control experiment of angle between carbon fiber and wood grain indicated that bonding quality of samples with carbon fiber parallel to wood grain was better than that with carbon fiber perpendicular to wood grain.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

552-555

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Bodig and B.A. Jayne: Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composites (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York 1982).

Google Scholar

[2] G.M. Raftery, A.M. Harte and P.D. Rodd: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 29 (2009), p.101.

Google Scholar

[3] J.F. Davalos, Y.C. Kim and E.J. Barbero: Finite Elem. Anal. Des. Vol. 19 (1995), p.181.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Özçifçi and F. Yapıcı: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 22 (2008), p.1543 Group Fiber Fabric Adhesive Glue Spread [g/m 2].

Google Scholar

[1] CFF PVAc 200.

Google Scholar

[2] CFF PVAc 400.

Google Scholar

[3] CFF PVAc 600.

Google Scholar

[4] CFF MDI 200.

Google Scholar

[5] CFF MDI 400.

Google Scholar

[6] CFF MDI 600.

Google Scholar

[7] CFF Epoxy 200.

Google Scholar

[8] CFF Epoxy 400.

Google Scholar

[9] CFF Epoxy 600.

Google Scholar

[10] GFF PVAc 200.

Google Scholar

[11] GFF PVAc 400.

Google Scholar

[12] GFF PVAc 600.

Google Scholar

[13] GFF MDI 200.

Google Scholar

[14] GFF MDI 400.

Google Scholar

[15] GFF MDI 600.

Google Scholar

[16] GFF Epoxy 200.

Google Scholar

[17] GFF Epoxy 400.

Google Scholar

[18] GFF Epoxy 600.

Google Scholar

[19] GFM PVAc 200.

Google Scholar

[20] GFM PVAc 400.

Google Scholar

[21] GFM PVAc 600.

Google Scholar

[22] GFM MDI 200.

Google Scholar

[23] GFM MDI 400.

Google Scholar

[24] GFM MDI 600.

Google Scholar

[25] GFM Epoxy 200.

Google Scholar

[26] GFM Epoxy 400.

Google Scholar

[27] GFM Epoxy 600.

Google Scholar

[28] GFMa PVAc 200.

Google Scholar

[29] GFMa PVAc 400.

Google Scholar

[30] GFMa PVAc 600.

Google Scholar

[31] GFMa MDI 200.

Google Scholar

[32] GFMa MDI 400.

Google Scholar

[33] GFMa MDI 600.

Google Scholar

[34] GFMa Epoxy 200.

Google Scholar

[35] GFMa Epoxy 400.

Google Scholar

[36] GFMa Epoxy 600.

Google Scholar