Design Method of Kitting System in Flexible Assembly Line Based Manufacturing for Mass Customisation Adaptation

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes the design method of kitting systems for variant engine assembly, which contribute to performance of parts assembly flexibility and efficiency. The need for efficient material handling part delivery is higher especially in automotive industry due to extensive product customisation and the small area to keep all the necessary parts at the assembly line. The paper focuses on the suitability of design KS in the essence of reliability, safety and ergonomics of workers. Relatively, the design consider the flexibility of the kit process in engine assembly parts with regard to performance measurement resulting in overall efficiency and accuracy of production line. Associated with Lean approach, KS provide an essential outcome required that avert a non value adding activities to take place in assembly line. It is believed that the findings of this study will provide an optimum efficiency of part feeding process between variant parts model. In particular, KS is cost efficient when extensive sorting process, parts model misplaced and lack of space can be avoided.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

243-248

Citation:

Online since:

December 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.Y. Hua, and D.J. Johnson, Research issues on factors influencing the choice of kitting versuslinestocking, International Journal of Production Research, 2010; 48(3), pp.779-800.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540802456802

Google Scholar

[2] G. Chryssolouris, N. Papakostas, N., D. Mavrikios, A Perspective on Manufacturing Strategy: Produce more with Less, CIRP Journal Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2008; 1(1), p.45–52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2008.06.008

Google Scholar

[3] G. Chryssolouris, Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] M.A. Corakci, An evaluation of kitting systems inlean production, Master thesis, 2008; University Of Boras, Boras.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.A. Bozer, and L.F. McGinnis, Kitting versus line stocking: a conceptual framework and a descriptivemodel, International Journal of Production Economics, 1992; 28(1), pp.1-19.

DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(92)90109-k

Google Scholar

[6] L.L. Kosteand M.K. Malhotra. A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturingflexibility, Journal of Operations Management, 1999; 18(1), pp.75-93.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Medbo. Assembly work execution and materials kit functionality in parallel flow assembly systems, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2003; 31, pp.263-281.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00220-2

Google Scholar

[8] A. Caputo and P.M. Pelagagge. A methodology for selecting assembly systems feedingpolicy, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2011; 111(1), pp.84-112.

DOI: 10.1108/02635571111099749

Google Scholar

[9] C.J. Sellers and S.Y. Nof. Part kitting in robotic facilities, Material Flow, 1986; 3(1-3), pp.163-174.

Google Scholar

[10] M.I. Johansson. Kitting systems for small size parts in manual assembly systems, in Pridham, M. and O'Brien, C. (Eds), Production Research: Approaching the 21st Century, Taylor & Francis, London, 1991; pp.225-230.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Medbo. Materials supply and product descriptions for assembly systems – design andoperation, Dissertation, 1999, Chalmers University of Technology, Go¨teborg.

Google Scholar

[12] F.Y. Ding and B. Puvitharan. Kitting in just-in-time production, Production &InventoryManagement Journal, 1990; 31(4), pp.25-28.

Google Scholar

[13] F.Y. Ding. Kitting in JIT production: a kitting project at a tractor plant, IndustrialEngineering, 1992; 24(9), pp.42-43.

Google Scholar

[14] H. S. Kilic &M. B. Durmusoglu. Design of kitting system in lean-based assembly lines. Assembly Automation, 2012; 32(3), pp.226-234.

DOI: 10.1108/01445151211244357

Google Scholar

[15] D. Alford, P. Sackettand G. Nelder. Mass customisation – an automotive perspective, International Journal of Production Economics, 2000; 66(1), pp.99-110.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(99)00093-6

Google Scholar

[16] R. Hanson, L. Medbo andP. Medbo. Assembly station design: A quantitative comparison of the effects of kitting and continuous supply. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2012; 23(3), pp.315-327.

DOI: 10.1108/17410381211217399

Google Scholar

[17] C. Wänström andL. Medbo. The impact of materials feeding design on assembly process performance, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2009; 20(1), pp.30-51.

DOI: 10.1108/17410380910925398

Google Scholar

[18] W.P. Neumann and L. Medbo. Ergonomic and technical aspects in the redesign of material supply systems: Big Boxes vs Narrow Bins, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2010; 40(5), pp.541-548.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.06.004

Google Scholar

[19] C. Finnsgård, C. Wänström,L. Medbo andW.P. Neumann. Impact of materials exposure on assembly workstation performance. International Journal of Production Research, 2011; 49(24), 7253-7274.

DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.503202

Google Scholar

[20] R. Hanson, Effects of using minomi in in-plant materials supply, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2011; 22(1), pp.90-106.

DOI: 10.1108/17410381111099824

Google Scholar