Experiment and Surface Roughness Prediction Model for Ti-6Al-4V in Abrasive Belt Grinding

Abstract:

In abrasive belt grinding, abrasive belt granularity, abrasive belt speed,feeding speed and grinding force have a great influence on the surface roughness. In order to predicate the surface roughness of Ti-6Al-4V,a response surface methodology are used to build the model to predict surface roughness,and the influence of various parameters on surface roughness was analysed. The research shows that with the abrasive belt granularity and abrasive belt speed increasing,the work piece surface roughness decreases;with the grinding force and feeding speed increasing,the work piece surface roughness increases. Through the test,the response surface methodology with high prediction accuracy,provides a theoretical basis for the reasonable selection of abrasive belt grinding parameters.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1136)
• Pages: 42-47
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1136.42
• Online since: January 2016
• Authors: Ya Xiong Chen*, Yun Huang, Gui Jian Xiao, Gui Lin Chen, Zhi Wu Liu, Xiu Mei Liu
• Keywords: Abrasive Belt Grinding, Prediction Model, Response Surface, Surface Roughness

References

[1] Hailong WU Basic Research on CNC Abrasive Belt Grinding Process of Aero Engine Precision Forged Blade. 2012, China, Chongqing.

[2] HUANG Y, Huang. Z. Modern abrasive belt grinding technology and application in engineering. 2009, Chongqing.

[3] Dong Zhang, Chao Yun, Dezheng Song(2011) Dexterous space optimization for robotic belt grinding. Procedia Engineering 15: 2762 – 2766.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.520

[4] Hua CHAI(2013) Research on Belt Wear in Aero Engine Blade Processed by CNC Abrasive Grinding. China, Chongqing.

[5] Ali Boubakri, Amor Hafiane, Salah Al Tahar Bouguecha . Application of response surface methodology for modeling and optimization of membrane distillation desalination process. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 20 (2014) 3163–3169.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.060

[6] V. Mugendiran, A. Gnanavelbabu. Parameter optimization for surface roughness and wall thickness on AA5052 Aluminium alloy by incremental forming using response surface methodology. Procedia Engineering 97 ( 2014 ) 1991 – (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.442

[7] Bas.D., Boyacı, I.H., 2007. Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng. 78, 836–845.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024

[8] Yin, G., Dang, Y., 2008. Optimization of extraction technology of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides by Box–Behnken statistical design. Carbohydr. Polym. 74, 603–610.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.025

[9] K. Palani Kumar, Modelling and analysis for surface roughness inmachining glass fiber reinforced plastics using response surface methodology, Materials and Design, 28 (1) 2007 2611 -2618.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.001

[10] X. Ren, M. Cabaravdic, X. Zhang, B. Kuhlenkotter (2007) A local process model for simulation of robotic belt grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 47: 962–970.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.07.002

[11] H. Sevik, S. Can kurnaz, Properties of alumina particulate reinforced aluminium alloy produced by pressure die casting, Mater. Des. 279(2006): 676–683.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.006

[12] J. Sleziona, Influence ceramic particles on Al–SiC, Al–Al2O3 composites solidification, Arch. Mater. Sci. 16 (1995) 163–178.

[13] Guijian Xiao, Yun Huang(2014) Constant-load adaptive belt polishing of the weak-rigidity blisk blade. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10. 1007/s00170-014-6724-4.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6724-4

[14] Zheng, X., Wang, X., Lan, Y., Shi, J., Xue, S.J., Liu, C., 2009. Application of response surface methodology to optimize microwave-assisted extraction of silymarin from milk thistle seeds. Sep. Purif. Technol. 70, 34–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.08.008