Contributions Regarding Working Environment Impact of Submerged Arc Welding

Article Preview

Abstract:

Paper presents the main pollutants of the working environment at welding under flux, methodical determination which the main chemical reactions resulting in pollution and pollution coefficient calculation. A number of welding working regime in order to achieve a coefficient of minimal pollution. The experimental results demonstrate that the process of welding under flux is less polluting than manual arc welding and coated electrode but more polluting than the process of welding in protective gas environment. It shows the influence of welding regime parameters for the most important gas pollutants.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

107-112

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Amza, Gh., Materials technology treaty, Academia Română Publisher, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Amza, Gh., Ecotechnology and durable development, Printech Publisher, (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Amza Gh, and others, Theoretical and experimental contribution on environmental pollution using the manual arc Welding, WSEAS Proceeding of the International Conference on Energy and Environmental Technologies, Bucharest, (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] Cicic D., Solomon Gh., Iacobescu G., Rontescu C. – Research regending Quality of the welded joints obtained by applying the techniques of welding renewal to components from the energy industry made from SA 387 gr. 12, Buletin Stiintific U.P.B., vol. 71, nr. 3, 2009, pag. 35-51.

Google Scholar

[5] John, H., Welding design theory and practice, WRC Bulletin, p.412, (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] Paise, S., Research to establish the reactions that occurs on the formation of the weld joint and the determination of the environmental impact of the GMAW process, Scientific Bulletin, series I, nr. 1, Mechanical Engineering, Bucharest, (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Rontescu, C., and others, Analysis of thermal cutting process in preparing joints welded joints, Conferinta ASR, Sudura (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] Zamfir, Gh., Environmental pollution, Junimea Publishing, Iaşi, (1994).

Google Scholar

[9] Groza, M., Theoretical and experimental environmental impact of the Submerged arc welding, PhD Thesis, U.P.B. Bucharest, (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] Iacobescu G., Rontescu C., Welding equipment, vol. II, Editura Politehnica Press.

Google Scholar

[11] Botez S.C., Dina V. C., Dumitru G. M., Dumitru B., Iacobescu G. – Characterisation of metallic layers deposited throught thermal spraying, Scientific Bulletin, U.P.B., (2014).

Google Scholar

[12] Amza, Gh., Babis, C, Nitoi, D., The influence of the specific rehabilitation techniques toegrindig" and "WIG remelting, in case of welded structure, Metalurgija, vol. 53, pag. 71-74, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.684.362

Google Scholar

[13] Nitoi, D., Dumitru, M., Dumitru, B., Mihailescu, A., Cismas, S., Reconditioning by Metal Deposition Technology. Temperature Finite Element Modeling, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 1029 (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1029.130

Google Scholar

[14] Balchin, N., C., Health and safety in welding and allied processes, Abington Publishing, ISBN 1 85573 032 4.

Google Scholar

[15] Hilton, D., E., Plumridge, P., N., Particulate fume generation during GMAW and GTAW, Welding and metal fabrication, December, (1991).

Google Scholar

[16] Formation of nitric- oxides in gas welding, Measures for the prevention of injuries to health, Doc. IIS/IIW-640-80, Welding in the world, Vol 18, No. 7/8. (1980).

Google Scholar