Paper Titles

Study on the Stabilization/Solidification of Lead-Contaminated Soil Using Alkali-Activated Cementing Materials with Rich-Silicon Materials
p.291

Stabilization of Cd in Ore Soil Using Modified Red Mud Materials
p.296

Mechanistic Insight into H₂S Adsorption and Dissociation on MoP(010): A Density Functional Investigation
p.300

Experimental Study on the Emergency Disposal Agent for Methanol Leakage
p.306

A Comparison Study of the Rapid Setting Conventional and Polymer-Modified Waterproof Mortars
p.317

The Study of Preparation Technology of the Material Saving Plastic Building Moulding Board
p.323

An Experimental Research on Basic Properties of Ceramsite Cellular Concrete
p.329

Research on Performance of CRTS I Cement-Emulsified Asphalt Mortar on Site
p.334

Study on the Aging and Pore Structure of Hydraulic Concrete
p.340

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 1142A Comparison Study of the Rapid Setting...

A Comparison Study of the Rapid Setting Conventional and Polymer-Modified Waterproof Mortars

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mechanical properties, including the compressive strength, flexural strength and adhesion strength of the rapid setting conventional and polymer-modified waterproof mortars are systematically compared in this paper. The polymer modification is demonstrated to increase the flexural strength and adhesion strength of the rapid setting waterproof mortar whereas it reduces its compressive strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

2016 International Conference on Advanced Material Research and Application

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1142)

Pages:

317-322

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1142.317

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2017

Authors:

Yanwen LI, Xiao Xue, Zhuo Yang, Zhong Yu He, Jie Qin, Wei Dong Zhang, Li Jin Xu, Jian Qu, Ru Feng Jia

Keywords:

Adhesion Strength, Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, Rapid Setting, Water Impermeability, Waterproof Mortar

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Swamy RN, Tanikawa S. An external surface coating to protect concrete and steel from aggressive environments. Mater. Struct. 1993; 26(8): 465–478.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02472806

[2] Aguiar JB, Camoes A, MoreiraPM. Coatings for concrete protection against aggressive environments. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2008; 6(1): 243–250.

[3] Barbucci A, Delucchi M, CerisolaG. Organic coatings for concrete protection: liquid water and water vapour permeabilities. Prog. Org. Coat. 1997; 30(4): 293– 297.

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9440(97)00007-6

[4] Vries IJ, Polder RB. Hydrophobic treatment of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 1997; 11(4): 259–265.

[5] Xue X, Yang J, ZhangW, JiangL, QuJ, XuL, Zhang H, Song J, Zhang R, Li Y, Qin J, Zhang Z. The study of an energy efficient cool white roof coating based on styrene acrylate copolymer and cement – Part I: optical properties, estimated cooling effect and relevant properties after dirt and accelerated exposures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015; 98: 176-184.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.045

[6] Dai J, Akira Y, Wittmann FH, Yokota H, Zhang P. Water repellent surface impregnation for extension of service life of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments: the role of cracks. Cement Concr. Compos. 2010; 32(2): 101–109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.001

[7] Xue X, Yang J, Zhang W, Jiang L, Qu J, Xu L, Zhang H, Song J, Zhang R, Li Y, Qin J, Zhang Z. The study of an energy efficient cool white roof coating based on styrene acrylate copolymer and cement – Part II: mechanical and water impermeability properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015; 96: 666-672.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.033

[8] Jiang L, Xue X, Zhang W, Yang J, Zhang H, Li Y, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Xu L, Qu J, Song J, QinJ. The investigations of factors affecting the water impermeability of inorganic sodium silicate-based concrete sealers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015; 93: 729-736.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.001

[9] Song Z, Xue X, Li Y, Yang J, He Z, Shen S, Jiang L, Zhang W, Xu L, Zhang H, Qu J, Ji W, Zhang T, Huo L, Wang B, Lin X, Zhang N. Experimental exploration of the waterproofing mechanism of inorganic sodium silicate-based concrete sealers. Constr. Build. Matter. 2016; 104: 276-283.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.069

[10] Schulze J, Killermann O. Long-term performance of redispersible powders in mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001; 31(3): 357-362.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00498-1

[11] Saija LM. Waterproofing of Portland cement mortars with a specially designed polyacrylic latex. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995; 25(3): 503-509.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00039-f

[12] Rottstegge J, Arnold M, Herschke L, Glasser G, Wilhelm M, Spiess HW, Hergeth WD. Solid state NMR and LVSEM studies on the hardening of latex modified tile mortar systems. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005; 35(12): 2233-2243.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.003

[13] Liu S, Hu Q, Zhao F, Chu X. Utilization of steel slag, iron tailings and fly ash as aggregates to prepare a polymer-modified waterproof mortar with a core–shell styrene–acrylic copolymer as the modifier. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014; 72: 15-22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.016

[14] Sakai E, Sujita J. Composite mechanism of polymer modified cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995; 25(1): 127-135.

[15] Al-Zahrani MM, Maslehuddin M, Al-Dulaijian SU, Ibrahim M. Mechanical properties and durability characteristics of polymer- and cement-based repair materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003; 25(4): 527-537.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00092-6

[16] Wu K, Zhang D, Song J. Properties of polymer-modified cement mortar using pre-enveloping method. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002; 32(3): 425-429.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00697-4

[17] Nepomuceno AA, Andrade C. Steel protection capacity of polymeric based cement mortars against chloride and carbonation attacks studied using electrochemical polarization resistance. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2006; 28(8): 716-721.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.05.011

[18] Aggarwal LK, Thapliyal PC, Karade SR. Properties of polymer-modified mortars using epoxy and acrylic emulsions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007; 21(2): 379-383.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.007

[19] Reis JML. Mechanical characterization of polymer mortars exposed to degradation solutions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009; 23(11): 3328-3331.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.047

[20] Medeiros MHF, Helene P, Selmo S. Influence of EVA and acrylate polymers on some mechanical properties of cementitious repair mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009; 23(7): 2517-2533.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.021

[21] Do J, Soh Y. Performance of polymer-modified self-leveling mortars with high polymer–cement ratio for floor finishing. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003; 33(10): 1497–505.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)01057-8

[22] Ramli M, Tabassi AA, Hoe KW. Porosity, pore structure and water absorption of polymer-modified mortars: An experimental study under different curing conditions. Composites: Part B 2013; 55(9): 221-233.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.022

[23] Sakai E, Sujita J. Composite mechanism of polymer modified cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995; 25(1): 127-135.

[24] Schulze J. Influence of water-cement ratio and cement content on the properties of polymer-modified mortars. Ces. Concr. Res. 1999; 29(6): 909-915.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00060-5

[25] Diamanti MV, Brenna A, Bolzoni F, Berra M, Pastore T, Ormellese M. Effect of polymer modified cementitious coatings on water and chloride permeability in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013; 49(6): 720–728.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.050

[26] Ramli M, Tabassi AA. Effects of polymer modification on the permeability of cement mortars under different curing conditions: A correlational study that includes pore distributions, water absorption and compressive strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012; 28(1): 561-570.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.09.004

[27] Almeida AEF, Sichieri EP. Mineralogical study of polymer modified mortar with silica fume. Constr. Build. Mater. 2006; 20(10): 882-887.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.029

[28] Kuhlmann LA. Latex-modified concrete for repair and rehabilitation of bridges. Int. J. Cement Composites & Lightweight Concrete 1985; 7(85): 241-247.

DOI: 10.1016/0262-5075(85)90044-2

[29] Nirmala J, Dhanalakshmi G. Influence of nano materials in the distressed retaining structure for crack filling. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015; 88: 225-231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.022

[30] Hamzaoui R, Guessasma S, Mecheri B, Eshtiaghi AM, Bennabi A. Microstructure and mechanical performance of modified mortar usinghempfibres and carbon nanotubes. Mater. Des. 2014; 56(4): 60-68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.084