Shock Response Analysis for a Journal-Bearing System by a Results Comparison

Abstract:

Shock response analysis of a journal-bearing system with the journal-bearing connection modeled as a spring link in radial direction and a dry contact joint respectively is presented. In the first model, the spring constants representing oil-film characteristic are determined by eight coefficients. In the second model, the friction forces are calculated using a modified Coulombs friction law. The contact detection points are the integration point and located at Gauss points. Only the contact normal pressure is treated as a Lagrange multiplier. The tangential contact stresses are calculated based on the penalty method. System’s time varying responses are obtained by FEM. A results comparison was performed between “spring link” model and “dry contact” model. The main conclusion is that stress distribution is nearly same in the system modeled by the two methods, but the amplitude in the former is smaller than that in the latter.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 129-131)
• Pages: 79-84
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.129-131.79
• Online since: August 2010
• Authors: Shao Hua He, Xin Yue Wu
• Keywords: Comparison, Dry Contact, Journal-Bearing System, Shock, Shock Response, Spring Link

References

[1] Ehrich. F., Handbook on Rotordynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1992).

[2] Rao. J. S., Rotor dynamics, Wiley, New York, (1992).

[3] Childs. D., Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling and Analysis, Wiley, New York, (1993).

[4] Lalanne. M., and Ferraris. G., Rotordynamics Prediction in Engineering, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, (1998).

[5] Suarez, L. E., Rohanimanesh. M. S., and Singh. M. P., Seismic Response of Rotating Machines[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1992, 21, 21-36.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290210102

[6] V. Srinivasan, A. H. Soni, Seismic Analysis of a Rotor-Bearing System[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1984, 12, 287- 311.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290120302

[7] Andrzej Grzadziela. An Analysis of Possible Assessment of Hazards to Ship Shaft Line, Resulting from Impulse Load[J]. Polish Maritime Research, 2007, 3, 12-20.

DOI: 10.2478/v10012-007-0013-1

[8] An Sung Lee, Byung Ok Kim, Yeong-Chun Kim. A finite element transient response analysis method of a rotor-bearing system to base shock excitations using the state-space Newmark scheme and comparisons with experiments[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 297, 595-615.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.028

[9] Zhu Xiaoping, Feng Qi, Shock Analysis of the Main Propulsion Shaft of the Ship[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2007, 11(1), 143-151.

[10] Shen Rongying, Zhang Zhiyong, Wang Yu, Shock response of propulsive shaft of vessel[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2000, (41)3, 74-79.

[11] Wen Banchun, Gu Jialiu, Xia Songbo, etc., Advanced rotor dynamics: theory、technology and application [M]. Mechanical industry press, China, (1999).

[12] J. Ambrósio. Impact of rigid and flexible multibody systems: deformation description and contact models, in: W. Schiehlen.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0203-5_4

[13] M. Valásek (Eds. ), Proceedings of the NATO-ASI on Virtual Non-linear Multibody Systems, vol. II, Prague, Czech Re. public, 2002, 15-33.