Constraint Projection Adaptive Natural Gradient Online Algorithm for SVM

Article Preview

Abstract:

The training of Support Vector Machine (SVM) is an optimization problem of quadratic programming which can not be applied to the online training in real time applications or time-variant data source. The online algorithms proposed by other researchers have high computational complexity and slow training speed, which can not be well applied to the time-variant problems as well. In this paper the projection gradient and adaptive natural gradient is combined. The constraint projection adaptive natural gradient online algorithm for SVM is proposed. The computation complexity of the constraint projection adaptive natural gradient algorithm is . The learning performance is compared via prediction of the concentration of component A of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor. The results of simulation demonstrate that the time taken by the constraint projection adaptive natural gradient online algorithm for SVM is far less than that of incremental algorithm, while keep higher prediction precision.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 139-141)

Pages:

1692-1696

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Vapnik: Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] V. Vapnik et al: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (1997), pp.281-287.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Byunghwa et al: Proc. SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference (2006), pp.5614-5618.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Cauwenberghs, T. Poggio: Machine Learning, Vol. 44(2001), pp.409-415.

Google Scholar

[5] J. H. Ma et al: Neural Computation, Vol. 15 (2003) No. 11, pp.2683-2703.

Google Scholar

[6] Information on http: /onlinesvr. altervista. org, June (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] D. C. Wang and B. Jiang: Control and Decision, Vol. 22(2007), pp.132-137.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Amari: Neural Computation, (1998), pp.251-276.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Amari, H. Park, and K. Fukumizu: Neural Computation, Vol. 12(2000), pp.1399-1409.

Google Scholar

[10] H. P. Yin: Research on Online Algorithm of SVM and Application in Modeling of CSTR. (MS., South China University of Technology, China 2009).

Google Scholar

[11] P. Wolfe: Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 19(1961), pp.239-244.

Google Scholar

[12] Shah L. U. et al., Proc. the 17 th European Signal Processing Conference (Glasgow, Scotland August 24-28, 2009), pp.884-888.

Google Scholar