Study on the Influence of Internal Flow Field in Pipeline Elbow by the Guide Plate

Article Preview

Abstract:

The liquid-conveying elbow is an very important part in the piping system, in this paper, the internal flow field in the pipeline elbow is studied, its structure is optimized, and the guide characteristic is improved. The results show that the internal total pressure difference in the original elbow is 29506.27 Pa, the Max-velocity is 7.12 m/s, and the internal flow field is very uneven;The internal total pressure difference can be greatly reduced through setting up the guide plates appropriately, its internal total pressure difference decreases as the number of guide plates increases, the Max-velocity decreases first and then increases as the number increases; When the number is a constant, the optimal result of guide plate according to the gold ratio arrangement is superior to the equidistance ratio arrangement; When the export length of guide plate is 50 mm, the total pressure difference is 14942 Pa in the elbow, comparing it to the result of the original elbow, it decreases 49.26%, the optimal design has an very obvious effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

130-133

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.L. Wang, Z.D. Wang: Ship Science and Technology Vol. 30 (2008), p.34.

Google Scholar

[2] A.L. Yu, J.H. Wen and Y.Z. Liu: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 45 (2009), p.36.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Ding, P.F. Weng: Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics Vol. 21 (2004), p.314.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Yakinthos, Z. Vlahostergios and A. Goulas: International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow Vol. 29 (2008), p.35.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Jiang, J.W. Zhang and C.J. Wu: Chinese Journal of Ship Research Vol. 3 (2008), p.37.

Google Scholar

[6] X.Y. Zhang, L.C. Shen and J.R. Fan: Journal of Zhejiang University Vol. 30 (1996), p.440.

Google Scholar