Cerium and Silane Conversion Coatings on AZ91 Magnesium Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

With different means of soaking treatment, simple cerium conversion coating, KH560 silane conversion coating, cerium silane conversion coating and silane cerium conversion coating are formulated. SEM, EDS, Tafel and EIS measurements were adopted as the analysis approaches, and organic resin is coated on the conversion coating surface for the salt spray test, so as to check mainly how much the corrosion resistant capabilities could be improved if conversion coating is applied to the magnesium alloy. The result shows that the cerium silane conversion coating and silane cerium conversion coating have a higher self-corrosion potential, lower corrosion current density, improve the binding force between the organic coating and magnesium alloy matrix more effectively, thus enhance dramatically the corrosion resistant protection capabilities for the whole coating applied on the magnesium alloy matrix.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 154-155)

Pages:

991-999

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li G Q, Liu C, Li J F: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 193(1-3) (2005), pp.112-116.

Google Scholar

[2] JE Gray, B Luan: J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 336(2002), pp.88-113.

Google Scholar

[3] A.L.K. Tana, A.M. Soutar, I.F. Annergren, Y.N. Liu: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 198 (2005), p.478–482.

Google Scholar

[4] C. S. Lin, S. K. Fang: J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 152(2) (2005), p. B54-B59.

Google Scholar

[5] L Y Niu, Z H Jiang, G Y L: Surf. & Coat. Technol. Vol. 200(2006), pp.3021-3026.

Google Scholar

[6] C. G. Silva, A. N. Correia: Corros. Sci. Vol. 47(3) (2005), pp.709-722.

Google Scholar

[7] Kouisni, M. Azzi, F Dalard: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 192 (2-3) (2005), pp.239-246.

Google Scholar

[8] F Zuchi, V Grassi, A Frignanit: Surf. & Coat. Technol. Vol. (200) (2006), pp.4-143.

Google Scholar

[9] M. F. Montemor, A. M. SimÕes, M. J. Carmezim: Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 253(2007), pp.6922-6931.

Google Scholar

[10] A Hayes Scott, Yu Pu, J. O'Keefe Thomas: J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 12 (149)(2002), p. C623-C630.

Google Scholar

[11] L. R. Amy, B. B. Carmel, Mansfeld Florian: Corros. Sci. Vol. 42(2)2000, pp.275-288.

Google Scholar

[12] F. H. Scholes, C. Soste, A. E. Hughes : Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 253(2006), pp.1-780.

Google Scholar

[13] C. S. Lin, S. K. Fang: J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 152(2) (2005), p. B54-B59.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Bohm, R. Greef, H. N. McMurray: J. Electrochem Soc. Vol. 147(9) (2000), pp.3-293.

Google Scholar

[15] A.L.K. Tana, A.M. Soutar, I.F. Annergren, Y.N. Liu: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 198 (2005), p.478–482.

Google Scholar

[16] I. De. Graeve, J Vereecken, A Franquet: Prog. Org. Coat. Vol. 6(2006), pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[17] Wim J van Ooij, Ricole A. Edwards, Ashok Sabata, United States Patent 5, 292, 549. (1994).

Google Scholar

[18] M.F. Montemor, A.M. Cabral, M.L. Zheludkevich, M.G.S. Ferreira: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 200(2006), p.2875.

Google Scholar

[19] M.F. Montemor, A.M.P. Simo˜es, M.G.S. Ferreira: Prog. Org. Coat. Vol. 44 (1)(2002), p.79.

Google Scholar

[20] M. Cabral, R.G. Duarte, M.F. Montemor, M.G.S. Ferreira: Prog. Org. Coat. Vol. 54 (2005), p.322.

Google Scholar

[21] B.Y. Johnson, J. Edington, A. Williams, M. J. O'Keefe: Material Characterization. Vol 54(2005), pp.41-48.

Google Scholar