Effect of Organic Loading Rate on Fermentative Hydrogen Production in CSTR

Abstract:

This study investigated the impact of five organic loading rates (OLRs) ranging from 16 kg COD/m3-d to 32 kg COD/m3-d on the performance of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) for biological hydrogen production, with molasses as substrate. Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) was kept at 6 hours and the temperature 35°C. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) varied from -328 mV to -419 mV. The ethanol-type fermentation has been conducted during the process. A positive statistical correlation was observed between OLR and biogas yield; however, it became negative for the OLR of 32 kg COD/m3-d (Fig1). The system maintained the highest average biogas and hydrogen yield of 14.66 L/d and 5.17 L/d at OLR of 28 kg COD/m3-d. Compared with the first stage (16 kg COD/m3-d), ethanol and butyric concentration of the last stage (32 kg COD/m3-d) increased about 2.01 and 3.79 times, respectively; Acetic acid concentration surged around 200 mg/L; Prop ionic acid concentration dropped slightly; Valeric acid concentration, which took a small portion in the volatile fatty acid (VFA), kept low. When OLR was kept at 28 kg COD/m3-d, the average ethanol to acetic acid ratio is 3.90.Thus proved that the optimal OLR for hydrogen production under experimental condition is 28 kg COD/m3-d.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 156-157)
• Pages: 732-736
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.156-157.732
• Online since: October 2010
• Authors: Shuang Gao, Bing Wang, Lei Lei Zhu, Wei Han, Hong Chen, Yong Feng Li
• Keywords: CSTR, Ethanol-Type Fermentative Hydrogen Production, Hydrogen Yield, OLR

References

[1] S. Venkata Mohan, V. Lalit Babu, P.N. Sarma. Enzyme and Microbial Technology: 41(2007), p.506.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.04.007

[2] Mi-Sun Kim, Dong-Yeol Lee. Bioresource Technology: 101 (2010), s48.

[3] Patrick C H, Benemann J R. International J of Hydrogen Energy: 27(2000), p.1185.

[4] Hisham Hafez, George Nakhla, M. Hesham El. Naggar, Elsayed Elbeshbishy, Bita Baghchehsaraee. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy: 35(2010), p.81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.051

[5] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; (1995).

[6] Van Ginkel SW, Logan B. Water Res 39; 16; (2005), p.3819.

[7] Yong Feng Li, Nan Qi Ren, Ying Chen, Guo Xiang Zheng. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy: 32 (2007), p.755.

[8] LI Yong-feng, HAN Wei, XU Jing-li, CHEN Hong, WANG Lu, Chuan-ping. International Conference on Biomass Energy Technologies: Dec3-5(2008), p.855.