Effect of pH, ORP and Influent COD on Hydrogen Content in Fermentative Hydrogen Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fermentative hydrogen production was carried out using a continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR) for the investigation of the hydrogen content in the biogas. Molasses was used as the substrate; hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 6 h; the temperature was in the range of 35±1 .It was showed that hydrogen content increased from 38% to 59% when pH decreased from 5 to 4.6 with oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) increased from -420 mV to -380 mV. The hydrogen content dropped from 50% to 30% as influent COD was improved from4000 mg/L to 6000 mg/L. Hydrogen content increased to 35% when influent COD was improved to 7000 mg/L, however decreased to 25% when influent COD was 8000 mg/L. Ethanol in terminal products is accompanied with hydrogen production but with lower hydrogen content. Butyric acid indicates higher hydrogen content than ethanol.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 156-157)

Pages:

877-881

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rocha JS, Barbosa MJ, Wijffels RH. In: Zaborsky OR, Benemann JR, Miyake J, Pietro AS, editors. Biohydrogen. NewYork: Plenum Publishing; 2001. pp.3-30.

Google Scholar

[2] Hisham Hafez, George Nakhla, M. Hesham El. Naggar, Elsayed Elbeshbishy, Bita Baghchehsaraee. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010; 35(1): 81-92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.051

Google Scholar

[3] Mi-Sun Kim, Dong-Yeol Lee. Bioresource Technology, 2010; 101(1): S48-S52.

Google Scholar

[4] Nan-Qi Ren, Ji-Fei Xu, Ling-Fang Gao, Liang Xin, Jie Qiu, Dong-Xia Su. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010; 35(7): 2742-2746.

Google Scholar

[5] Hisham Hafez, George Nakhla, M. Hesham El. Naggar, Elsayed Elbeshbishy, Bita Baghchehsaraee. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010 35(1): 81-92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.051

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Fernández-Nava, E. Marañón, J. Soons, L. Castrillón. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 17(1-3): 682-688.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.140

Google Scholar

[7] N.Q. Ren, B.Z. Wang and J.L. Hung. Biotechnol Bioeng , 2000, 54; 428–433.

Google Scholar

[8] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] Yong Feng Li, Nan Qi Ren, Ying Chen, Guo Xiang Zheng. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 3, ( 6); 755-760.

Google Scholar

[10] Chin-Chao Chen, Hong-Pin Chen, Jou-HsienH Wu, Chiu-Yue Lin. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008; 33: 1573-1578.

Google Scholar

[11] F. R. Hawkes, R. Dinsdale, D. L. Hawkes, I. Hussy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002 27(11-12) , 1339-1347.

Google Scholar