Behavior of Rigid Composite Joint under Combination of Bending Moment and Tensional Force

Abstract:

In recent years, the progressive collapse of buildings increases the interest in progressive collapse studies. If a key column fails in structure, the internal force is redistributed by the catenary action of joint to prevent its progressive collapse. The joint connecting to the failed column is under the state of bending moment combined with tensional force and the tensional force would affect the moment-resistance ability and ductility of joint. In this paper, the finite element software ABAQUS is applied to analyze the behavior of composite joints under the state of bending moment combined with tensional force. The effects of rebar ratio, rebar strength, concrete strength, etc., on the behavior of joints are investigated. The results show that high strength steel is suggested to be used in composite joint to improve its bending moment capacity and tensional capacity.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 163-167)
• Pages: 2247-2255
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.2247
• Online since: December 2010
• Authors: Lan Hui Guo, Shan Gao, Su Mei Zhang
• Keywords: Bending Moment Combined with Tensional Force, Composite Joint, Progressive Collapse

References

[1] ASCE. SEI/ASCE 7-05 minimum design loads for buildings and other structures Washington DC: American Society of Civil Engineers. (2005).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784408094.sup

[2] BS 8110-1: 1997, Structural use of concrete: Part 1：Code of practice for design and construction [S]. London: British Standards Institute. (2002).

[3] General Service Administration. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects [S]. (2003).

[4] U.S. Department of Defense. Unified Facilities Criteria: Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse [S]. UFC 4-023-03，(2005).

[5] X.F. Jiang, Y.Y. Chen. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(6): 1-8.

[6] W.J. YI, Q.F. He and Y. Xiao. Journal of Building Structures, 2007, 28(5): 104-117.

[7] X.Z. Lu, Y. Li, L.P. Ye. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(Sup. Ⅱ): 150-157.

[8] H.T. Zhao, S.M. Zhang. Design Principles of Composite Structure [M]. Education Press. (2005).

[9] Z.S. Song, Q. Gu and B. Guo. Journal of Building Structures. 2001, 22(1): 53-57.

[10] Y.J. Shi, X.L. Ao, Y.Q. Wang and G. Shi. China Civil Engineering Journal. 2009, 42(4): 48-54.

[11] R. Altmann, R. Maquoi and J. P. Jaspart. J. Construct. Steel Research, 1991, 18(6): 45-54.

[12] L.S. da Silva, R.D. Simoes and P.J. Cruz. Engineering Structures 23(2001): 1383-1409.

[13] X.P. Shu, Z.H. Zhang and Y.Q. Wang. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences). 2007, 34(11): 12-15.

[14] G.Q. Li, W.L. Shi. China Civil Engineering Journal. 2007, 40(9): 23-35.

[15] D.A. Nethercot. The Structural Engineer, 1995, 73(4): 218-219.

[16] M. Kattner, M. Crisinel. Computer and Structures, 78(2000): 341-353.

[17] S.T. Zhong. The Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Structures [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. (2003).

[18] D. Su. Seismic behavior of beam-to-column connections in steel structure with composite effect [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University. (2005).

[19] W. Bao. Performance of Partial-depth end-plates beam-to-column composite joints of steel frames under hogging moment [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology. (2006).