Finite Element Simulation on Three-point Bending of Brazed Aluminum Honeycomb Panel

Ming Jun Peng; Yong Sun; Ji Yao; Yong Hua Duan; Sai Bei Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.1046

Paper Titles

Behavioral Prediction of Reactive Powder Concrete Based on Artificial Neural Network
p.1030

Effects of Packing Degree and Calcium-Silicon Ratio of Cementitious Material on Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete
p.1034

Numerical Analysis on Vibration Mitigation Effect of EPS Geofoam on Retaining Wall
p.1038

Production of High-Performance Composite Concrete Segment and Experimental Investigation of Materials
p.1042

Finite Element Simulation on Three-point Bending of Brazed Aluminum Honeycomb Panel
p.1046

Experiment and Finite Element Study on the Structural Behavior of Steel Sandwich Panels
p.1051

A Research on Performance of Waste Polystyrene Insulation Block
p.1055

Experimental Research on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Steel Fiber High-Strength Concrete
p.1061

Preparation of a Superhydrophobic Carbon Dilm by a Novel Vapor Phase Transport Process
p.1065

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 168-170Finite Element Simulation on Three-point Bending...

Finite Element Simulation on Three-point Bending of Brazed Aluminum Honeycomb Panel

Abstract:

The mechanics behaviors on three-point bending of brazed aluminum honeycomb panel by FEM are investigated in this paper. The results show that honeycomb panel have three typical failure modes under bending load：failure of honeycomb core collapse, the whole panel bending failure and face sheet shear failure. Honeycomb lateral bending failure load is greater than the longitudinal bending failure load. When the ratio of honeycomb core thickness and panel thickness is between 10% to 15%, the strongest cellular panel bending occurs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Building Materials, ICSBM 2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 168-170)

Pages:

1046-1050

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.1046

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2010

Authors:

Ming Jun Peng, Yong Sun, Ji Yao, Yong Hua Duan, Sai Bei Wang

Keywords:

Bend, Brazed, Finite Element Model (FEM), Honeycomb Material

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] ESA: Structural Materials Handbook ESA PSS-03-203. Noordwijk: ESTEC, (1994).

Google Scholar

[2] HEXCEL: Mechanical properties of Hexcel honeycomb materials TSB 120. (1987).

Google Scholar

[3] HEXCEL: The basics on bonded sandwich construction TSB 124. (1987).

Google Scholar

[4] Ehmann D, Becker W, Salmen H. Aspects of structural design optimization for high precision refectors and mirrors. In: Spacecraft Structures and Mechanical Testing, Cepadues ed. Toulouse: CNES, 1994: 263-72.

Google Scholar

[5] Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids - Structure and Properties. Oxford: Pergamon, (1988).

Google Scholar

[6] Li Dongtian. Brazed aluminum honeycomb Development and Mechanical Properties of [D]. Kunming University of Technology, (2005).

Google Scholar

[7] Yuan Zhang, Zheng Baizhe, Li Ni. Honeycomb sandwich panel theory. Beijing Technology and Business University (Natural Science) [J], 2001, 12: 47-50.

Google Scholar

[8] Masters IG, Evans KE. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Compos Struct 1996; 35: 403–22.

Google Scholar

[9] Becker W. Closed-form analysis of the thickness effect of regular honeycomb core material. Compos Struct 2000; 48: 67–70.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(99)00074-4

Google Scholar

[10] Meraghni F, Desrumaux F, Benzeggagh ML. Mechanical behaviour of cellular core for structural sandwich panels. Composites: Part A 1999; 30: 767–79.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(98)00182-1

Google Scholar