Effect of Particle Sizes of Magnesium Oxide on Zirconia Toughened Alumina Vickers Hardness

Article Preview

Abstract:

Vickers hardness of zirconia toughened alumina added MgO with different composition and particle size has been studied. Five different size of magnesium oxide particle at different composition (0.5 wt % to 0.9 wt %) were used in this experiment. Each batch of composition was mixed, uniaxially pressed into 13 mm pellets and sintered at 1600oC for 4 hours in pressureless conditions. Analysis of Vickers hardness, microstructural observation and EDX analysis has been carried out. Microstructural observation showed that the addition of magnesium oxide greatly affected zirconia toughened alumina microstructure. Smaller Al2O3 grain size is observed with the presence of MgO thus improving its mechanical properties such as hardness and density. Results of Vickers hardness increased linearly with addition of more MgO until a certain composition. Each particle size of MgO addition show different composition is needed to reach the optimum Vickers hardness, depending on the particle size. The increase of hardness of the cutting insert is mainly contributed by small sized Al2O3 grains due to the microstructure pinning effect introduced by MgO. Maximum Vickers hardness achieved in this experiment is 1710 Hv, obtained at 0.7 wt% MgO with 0.15 µm particle size.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

29-34

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Q. Like, L. Xikun, P. Yang, M. Weimin, Q. Guanming, and S. Yanbin, Journal of Rare Earths Vol. 25, No. Supplement 2, 2007, pp.322-326.

DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0721(07)60495-5

Google Scholar

[2] B. Smuk, M. Szutkowska, and J. Walter, Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 133, No. 1-2, 2003, pp.195-198.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Xing, Z. Jun, H. Chuanzhen, and Z. Jianhua, Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 248, No. 1-2, 1998, pp.125-131.

Google Scholar

[4] A.Z.A. Azhar, , M.M. Ratnam, and Z.A. Ahmad, Journal of Alloys and Compounds Vol. 478, No. 1-2, 2009, pp.608-614.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Basu, J. Vleugels, and O. Van Der Biest, Journal of Alloys and Compounds Vol. 372, No. 1-2, 2004, pp.278-284.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.09.157

Google Scholar

[6] T. Sornakumar, M.V. Gopalakrishnan, R. Krishnamurthy, and C.V. Gokularathnam, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials Vol. 13, No. 6, 1995, pp.375-378.

DOI: 10.1016/0263-4368(95)00026-f

Google Scholar

[7] P.M. Kelly and L.R. Francis Rose, Progress in Materials Science Vol. 47, No. 5, 2002, pp.463-557.

Google Scholar

[8] Hao, J.K.C., A.Z.A. Azhar, M.M. Ratnam, and Z.A. Ahmad, Materials Science and Technology Vol. 26, No. 1, 2010, pp.95-103.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Szutkowska, Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 153-154, 2004, pp.868-874.

Google Scholar

[10] R.L. Coble, , Journal Applied Physics Vol. 32, No. 5, 1961, pp.793-799.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Teng, , H. Liu, and C. Huang, Materials Science and Engineering: A Vol. 452-453, 2007, pp.545-551.

Google Scholar

[12] A.Z.A. Azhar, , H. Mohamed, M.M. Ratnam, and Z.A. Ahmad, Journal of Alloy and Compunds Vol. 497, 2010, pp.316-320.

Google Scholar