Perception of Motion Trajectory as a Spatial Concepts Activity for Children

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study proposes to develop a best treatment interface of motion trajectory as a construct for children to build up their sense of spatiality. There are 30 children from kindergarten participate in this research. There are two factors in the study, first is the “leading object” and the other is the “reference object”, and each factor contains two levels, hence, there are four treatments in this experiment. This research uses “maze” as a spatial sense conceptual tool, and the maze is constructed by 3D models as a virtual environment. The focus of this research is to find out the best treatment and does not cause cognitive burden on children in the meantime. The result of this research is that the best tr eatment of motion trajectory depends on the treatment of “leading object” with “reference object” for children when they grab spatial concepts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

332-337

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. Fan, P. C. Chen, and J. Yen, Learning HMM-based cognitive load models for supporting human-agent teamwork, Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 11, 2010, p.108–119.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.004

Google Scholar

[2] F. Amadieu, C. Mariné, and C. Laimay, The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations, Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, doi: 10. 1016/j. chb. 2010. 05. 009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.009

Google Scholar

[3] E. Macaluso, Orienting of spatial attention and the interplay between the senses, Cotex, vol. 46, 2010, p.282–297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.05.010

Google Scholar

[4] T. Bachmann, and C. Murd, Covert spatial attention in search for the location of a color-afterimage patch speeds up its decay from awareness: Introducing a method useful for the study of neural correlates of visual awareness, Vision Research, vol. 50, 2010, p.1048.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.013

Google Scholar

[5] D. Kersten, P. Mamassian, and D. C. Knill, Moving cast shadow induce apparent motion in depth, Perception, vol. 26, 1997, p.171–192.

DOI: 10.1068/p260171

Google Scholar

[6] E. Brenner, and J. B. J. Smeets, How well can people judge when something happened?, Vision Research, vol. 50, 2010, p.1101–1108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.004

Google Scholar

[7] J. Xia, C. Arrowsmith, M. Jackson, and W. Cartwright, The wayfinding process relationships between decision-making and landmark utility, Tourism Management, vol. 29, 2008, p.445–457.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.010

Google Scholar

[8] A. M. Hund, and S. N. Nazarczuk, The effects of sense of direction and training experience on wayfinding efficiency, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, 2009, p.151–159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.009

Google Scholar

[9] C. H. Shih, C. T. Shih, and H. C. Chiu, Using an Extended Automatic Target Acquisition Program with dual cursor technology to assist people with developmental disabilities improve their pointing efficiency, Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 31, 2010, pp.1091-1101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.03.008

Google Scholar

[10] U. Kombartzky, R. Ploetzner, S. Schlag, and B. Metz, Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations, Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, 2010, pp.424-433.

DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.002

Google Scholar

[11] T. Imura, M. K. Yamaguchi, S. Kanazawa, N. Shirai, Y. Otsuka, M. Tomonaga, and A. Yagi, Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding?, Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, 2010, pp.111-122.

DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010

Google Scholar

[12] S. Münzer, T. Seufert, and R. Brünken, Learning from multimedia presentations: Facilitation function of animations and spatial abilities, Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 19, 2009, p.481–485.

DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.001

Google Scholar

[13] C. S. Royden, and E. M. Connors, The detection of moving objects by moving observers, Vision Research, vol. 50, 2010, p.1014–1024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.008

Google Scholar

[14] T. Imura, M. K. Yamaguchi, S. Kanazawa, N. Shirai, Y. Otsuka, M. Tomonaga, and A. Yagi, Perception of motion trajectory of object from the moving cast shadow in infants, Vision Research, vol. 46, 2006, p.652–657.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.028

Google Scholar

[15] M. Fornells-Ambrojo, C. Barker, D. Swapp, M. Slater, A. Antley, and D. Freeman, Virtual reality and persecutory delusions: Safety and feasibility, Schizophrenia Research, vol. 104, 2008, p.228–236.

DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.05.013

Google Scholar

[16] S. W. Govenlock, C. P. Taylor, A. B. Sekule, and P. J. Bennett, The effect of aging on the spatial frequency selectivity of the human visual system, Vision Research, vol. 50, 2010, p.1712–1719.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.025

Google Scholar

[17] S. Fischer, and S. Schwan, Comprehending animations: Effects of spatial cueing versus temporal scaling, Learning and Instruction, 2009, pp.1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.005

Google Scholar