Determination of Mechanical Behavior of AA5083 Alloy under Machining Conditions, Applicable in Metal Cutting Simulation

Article Preview

Abstract:

As respects of usage of widespread machining procedures in producing industrial pieces, optimization of this procedure is one of most subject that attract researchers intrest. Finite element analysis based techniques are available to simulate cutting processes and offer several advantages including prediction of tool forces, distribution of stresses and temperatures, estimation of tool wear and residual stresses on machined surfaces, optimization of cutting tool geometry and cutting conditions. Success and reliability of numerical models are heavily dependent upon work material flow stress models in function of strain, strain rate and temperatures. In this paper Johnson-Cook material law, owing to its simplicity, has been used for simulating of Aluminum Alloy AA5083. The model parameters are determined by fitting the data from both quasi-static compression tests at law strain rates and machining tests at high strain rates. For calculating deforming parameters in machining being used analytical theory of Oxley. After getting result from the equation, its accuracy being checked either in compression tests or in machining tests by simulation with abaqus software.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 189-193)

Pages:

1507-1512

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.J. Hosseinipour. An investigation into hot deformation of aluminum alloy 5083, Materials and Design 30 (2009) 319–322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.063

Google Scholar

[2] Tore B^rvik, Arild H. Clausen, Odd Sture Hopperstad, Magnus Langseth Perforation of AA5083-H116 aluminium plates with conical-nose steel projectiles—experimental study, International Journal of Impact Engineering 30 (2004) 367–384.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(03)00072-1

Google Scholar

[3] Arild H. Clausen, Tore Børvik, Odd S. Hopperstad, Ahmed Benallal Flow and fracture characteristics of aluminium alloy AA5083–H116 as function of strain rate, temperature and triaxiality, Materials Science and Engineering A364 (2004) 260–272.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.027

Google Scholar

[4] Y.B. Guo An integral method to determine the mechanical behaviorof materials in metal cutting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 142 (2003) 72–81.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00462-x

Google Scholar

[5] M.E. Merchant, Mechanics of the metal cutting process, J. Appl. Phys. 16 (1945) ‏.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Usui, Progress of predictive theories in metal cutting, JSME Int. J. Ser. III 31 (2) (1988) 363–369.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Kobayashi, E.G. Thomsen, Metal cutting analysis. I. Re-evaluation and new method of presentation of theories, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 90 (1962) 63–70.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3667440

Google Scholar

[8] J.H.L. The, R.F. Scrutton, The stress-state in the shear zone during steady state machining, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 101 (1979).

Google Scholar

[9] N.N. Zorev, Metal Cutting Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1966).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Kalpakjian, Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, n3rd ed., Addison Wesley/Longman, Menlo Park, (1997).

Google Scholar

[11] B.F. von Turkovich, Shear stress in metal cutting, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 92 (1970) 151–157.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Spaans, Treatise of the streamlines and the stress, strain, and strain rate distributions, and on stability in the primary shear zone in metal cutting, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 94 (1972) 690–696.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3428230

Google Scholar

[13] S. Lei, Y.C. Shin, F.P. Incropera, Material constitutive modeling under high strain rates and temperatures through orthogonal machining tests, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 121 (1999) 577–585.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2833062

Google Scholar

[14] G. Poulachon, A.L. Moisan, I.S. Jawahir, Evaluation of chip morphology in hard turning using constitutive models and material property data, in: Proceedings of the ASME–IMECE, vol. 12, MED, New York, 2002, p.179–185.

DOI: 10.1115/imece2001/med-23319

Google Scholar

[15] Y.B. Guo, C.R. Liu, Mechanical properties of hardened AISI 52100 steel in hard machining processes, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 124 (1999) 1–9.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1413775

Google Scholar

[16] G.R. Johnson, J.M. Hoegfeldt, U.S. Lindholm, A. Nagy, Response of various metals to large torsional strains over a large range of strain rates. Part 1. Ductile metals, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 105 (1983) 42–47.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3225617

Google Scholar

[17] G.R. Johnson, J.M. Hoegfeldt, U.S. Lindholm, A. Nagy, Response of various metals to large torsional strains over a large range of strain rates. Part 1. Ductile metals, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 105 (1983) 42–47.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3225617

Google Scholar