Structure of Emulsion Cavitation Jet and Jet Peening Impact on the Fatigue of Plan Carbon Steel Q235A

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to developing the strengthening effect of liquid jet peening on the surface modification for metallic materials, in this study, an emulsion jet peening is produced by injecting a high-speed emulsion jet into an emulsion filled tank. The test system and fixed emulsion of cavitation jet was developed. High speed photography technique was used to observe and analysis the structure of emulsion cavitation jet at various upstream pressures . The results indicate that the structure of emulsion cavitation jet in terms of jet impact pressure, intensive degree and uniformity is better than that water jet. The jet structure depends on the jet pressure. The cavitation jet length increases rapidly at the initial stage and then it stabilizes after few milliseconds. The stabilized length of jet increases and the diverges angle decreases with increasing pressures. Specimens made of plan carbon steel (Q235A, China standard) were exposed to emulsion jet peening at the stand-off distances of 20 mm with a constant upstream pressure, 20 MPa for 60 s. The fatigue test shows that the crack initiation life by treatment of emulsion jet peening increases about 12.5% and 20.2% compared to water jet and unpeened specimen respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 189-193)

Pages:

476-483

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y S Zong, X Huang, Z Q Li, Application and development of advanced deformation technology[J] . Engineering plastic, 2006, 13(3):23-29. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Tonshoff H K, Kroos F, Marzenell C. High pressure water peening – a new mechanical surface strengthening process [J]. Annals of CRIP, 1997, 16: 113-116.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60787-2

Google Scholar

[3] Daniewicz S R, Cummings S D. Characterization of a water peening process [J]. Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mater. Tech, 1999, 121: 336-340.

Google Scholar

[4] Sahaya G A, Gnanamoorthy R. A novel surface modification technique for the introduction compressive residual stress and preliminary studies on aluminum alloy AA6063 [J]. Surf. Coat. Tech, 2006, 201: 1768-1775.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.002

Google Scholar

[5] Sahaya G A, Gnanamoorthy R. Surface modification by oil jet peening in Al alloy AA6063-T6 and AA6061-T4: Residual stress and hardening [J]. App. Surf. Sci, 2006, 253: 989-996.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.060

Google Scholar

[6] Odhiambo D, Soyama H. Cavitation shotless peening for improvement of fatigue strength of carbonized steel [J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25: 1217-1222.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(03)00121-x

Google Scholar

[7] Soyama H, Asahara M. Improvement in fatigue strength of silicon manganese steel SUP7 by using a cavitation jet [J]. JSME Int. J. Ser. A, 2000, 43: 173-178.

DOI: 10.1299/jsmea.43.173

Google Scholar

[8] Wanger L. Mechanical surface treatment on titanium and aluminum and magnesium alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng, 1999, A263: 210-216.

Google Scholar

[9] Mutoh Y, Fair G H, Noble B, et al. The effect of residual stresses induced by shot peening on fatigue crack propagation in two high strength aluminum alloys [J]. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Struct, 1997, 10: 261-272.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00205.x

Google Scholar

[10] A. Eftekhari, J. E. Talia, P. K. Mazumdar. Influence of surface condition on the fatigue of an aluminum-lithium alloy (2090-T3) [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng, 1995, A199: L3-L6.

DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(95)09805-4

Google Scholar

[11] Sun, Z., Kang, X. Q. and Wang, X. H. Experimental system of cavitation erosion with water jet [J]. Mater. Design, 2005, 26, 59-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.04.003

Google Scholar

[12] Zhenxing Zhao, Jianjing He . Hydraulics [M]. BeiJing, Tsinghua university press. 2005: 112. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] A. SAHAYA Grinspan, R. GNANAMOORTHY, Structure of oil cavitation jet and cavitation jet erosion of aluminum alloy, AA 6063 -T6, Structure of cavitation jet and cavitation jet erosion.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3129134

Google Scholar

[14] Dular, M., Stoffel, B. & Sirok, B. Development of a cavitation erosion model. Wear, 2006, 261, 642-655.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.020

Google Scholar

[15] Bebedetti, M., Bortolamedi, T., Fontanari, V. & Frendo, F. Bending fatigue behavior of differently shot peened Al 6082-T5 alloy. Int. J. Fatigue, 2004, 26, 889-897.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.12.003

Google Scholar

[16] Zhi Sun, Li Jiang, Pengzhan, Ying. Failure Analysis-foundation and application, China Machine Press, 2010, 144-145. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[17] Richard W, Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials, 2th Edi, 1983, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 541.

Google Scholar

[18] Y X Gao, J Z Yi, P D Lee, et al. A micro-cell of the effect of microstructure and on fatigue in cast aluminum alloys [J]. Acta Mater, 2004, 52: 5435-5449. In Chinese. *Corresponding author: Sui Yanwei, email: suiyanwei@cumt. edu. cn , Tel: 15852187006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.035

Google Scholar