Hybrid Artificial Glowworm Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Solving Constrained Engineering Problem

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, based on glowworm swarm (GS) and artificial fish swarm (AFS) with differential evolution (DE) optimization algorithm, a new hybrid artificial glowworm swarm optimization (HGSO) algorithm is proposed. We use HGSO to solve engineering optimization design problem. The results show that the HGSO has faster convergence, higher precision and is more effective for solving constrained engineering optimization problem.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 204-210)

Pages:

823-827

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Xiao-lei, Shao Zhi-jiang, Qian Ji-xin. An optimizing method based on autonomous animats: Fish-swarm algorithm. Systems Engineering and Theory and Practice, 22(11): 32-38 (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Krishnanand K.N., Ghose D. Glowworm swarm optimisation: a new method for optimising multi-modal functions. Int. J. Computational Intelligence Studies, 1(1): 93-119(2009).

DOI: 10.1504/ijcistudies.2009.025340

Google Scholar

[3] Price K.V. Differential evolution: A fast and simple numerical optimizer. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society . Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 524-527(1996).

DOI: 10.1109/nafips.1996.534790

Google Scholar

[4] Kirkpatric S, Gelatt C D and Vecchi M P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220: 671-680(1983).

DOI: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671

Google Scholar

[5] A.R. Hedar, M. Fukushima, Derivative-free filter simulated annealing method for constrained continuous global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization. 35 (4): 521-549(2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s10898-005-3693-z

Google Scholar

[6] He Q, Wang L. An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20: 89-99 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2006.03.003

Google Scholar

[7] Hui Liu, Zixing Cai, Yong Wang. Hybridizing particle swarm optimization with differential evolution for constrained numerical and engineering optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 10: 629-640(2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.031

Google Scholar

[8] Min Zhang, Wenjian Luo, Xufa Wang. Differential evolution with dynamic stochastic selection for constrained optimization. Information Sciences, 178 : 3043–3074(2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.02.014

Google Scholar

[9] Rao S S. Engineering optimization (third ed). New York: Wiley, (1996).

Google Scholar

[10] T. Ray, K.M. Liew. Society and civilization: an optimization algorithm based on the simulation of social behavior. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7 (4): 386-396(2003).

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2003.814902

Google Scholar

[11] Coello C A C, Montes E M. Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 16: 193-203(2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s1474-0346(02)00011-3

Google Scholar

[12] Yongquan Zhou, Shengyu Pei. A Hybrid Co-evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Solving Constrained Engineering Design Problems. Journal of Computers, 5(6): 965-972(2010).

DOI: 10.4304/jcp.5.6.965-972

Google Scholar