Microfluidic Device for Fluorescence Immunoassays by Using Porous Matrix

Xing Chen; Da Fu Cui; H. Li; H.Y. Cai; J.H. Sun; L.L. Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.216.645

Paper Titles

The Simulation of Aspheric Lensed Fiber Based on ABCD Matrix
p.625

Dielectric and Hot/Wet Properties of Methyl-Silsesquioxane/Cyanate Ester Resin Hybrid Materials
p.630

Preparation and Dielectric Properties of POSS-NH₂/Cyanate Ester Resin Organic-Inorganic Hybrids
p.635

Detector Afterpulsing Suppression by Fluorescence Lifetime Correlation Spectroscopy Method
p.640

Microfluidic Device for Fluorescence Immunoassays by Using Porous Matrix
p.645

Soft Magnetic Material (NiFe₂O₄) Particles Synthesized by Solvent Co-Precipitation Method
p.649

Optimal Design of Tunable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer in Silicon-on-Insulator
p.654

A Planar Lightwave Circuit Based on Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer with 16 Tunable Wavelength Channels
p.661

Effect of Resistance Spot Welding Parameters on the Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 Grade by Using 2³ Factorial Design
p.666

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 216Microfluidic Device for Fluorescence Immunoassays...

Microfluidic Device for Fluorescence Immunoassays by Using Porous Matrix

Abstract:

The present work presents the availability of using porous matrix in microfluidic devices as a solid phase matrix for immunoassays. Porous matrixes on the surface of the microchannels were microfabricated by MEMS technology and electrochemical etching technology, which were coated on the wall of the rectangular microchannel in the microdevices to provide a surface-enlarging matrix. The microfabrication process of porous matrixes was investigated and optimized. Then the surface morphology of the porous matrixes was characterized by SEM. Both direct method and dual-antibody sandwich method were used for fluorescence immunoassays. Using sandwich immunoassay, 6.25μg/mL - 25μg/mL human IgG in real samples have been detected with a correlation coefficient of 0.9773. These porous microdevices have shown some advantages over its large-scale counterparts, including lower sample and reagent consumption, lower cost, less analytical time and so on, which enables detection for clinical testing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Optical, Electronic Materials and Applications

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 216)

Pages:

645-648

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.216.645

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2011

Authors:

Xing Chen, Da Fu Cui, H. Li, H.Y. Cai, J.H. Sun, L.L. Zhang

Keywords:

Fluorescence Immunoassay, Lab-on-a-Chip, Porous Silicon

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] R. Daw, J. Finkelstein: Nature Vol. 442 (2006), pp.367-418.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Hatch, A. Kamholz, K. Hawkins, M. Munson, E. Schilling, B. Weigl and P. Yager: Nature Biotechnology Vol. 19 (2001), pp.461-465.

DOI: 10.1038/88135

Google Scholar

[3] Bilyalov R, Stalmans L, Beaucarne G, Loo R, Caymax M, Poortmans J and Nijs J 2001 Porous silicon as an intermediate layer for thin-film solar cell Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 65 477–85.

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0248(00)00130-6

Google Scholar

[4] M. Björkqvist, J. Salonen, J. Paski and E. Laine: Sensors Actuators A Vol. 112 (2004), p.244–247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2004.01.002

Google Scholar

[5] M. Bengtsson, S. Ekström, G. Marko-Varga and T. Laurell: Talanta Vol. 56 (2002), p.341–353.

Google Scholar

[6] C. Steinhauer, A. Ressine, G. Marko-Varga, T. Laurell, C.A. K Borrebaeck and C. Wingren: Anal. Biochem. Vol. 341 (2005), p.204–213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.10.036

Google Scholar

[7] O. Bisi, S. Ossicini and L. Pavesi: Surf. Sci. Rep. Vol. 38 (2000), p.1–126.

Google Scholar

[8] X. Chen, D.F. Cui, C.C. Liu, H. Li, J. Micromech. Microeng., Vol. 17 (2007), pp.68-75.

Google Scholar