Establishment of Performance Evaluation Indicators System and its Weighting Coefficient Determination Method

Abstract:

It’s important to improve the success rate and profit margins that establish a reasonable performance evaluation and weighting coefficient, and the implementation of performance evaluation. In connection with characteristic of software project performance evaluation system features, use balanced score card and analytic hierarchy process studying. First, establishment of performance evaluation indicators system, include indicators system principles of the elaboration, give the basic framework of the balanced score card, on financial indicators, customer indicators, internal business indicators, analysis of learning and growth indicators, base on the quality of software projects, through the table list the evaluation index system; second, study identifies indicators of performance evaluation method of weight, include the structure matrix, single-level sorting and consistency check, the level and consistency check of the total order of three basic steps, each step of calculation is given by mathematical formula. The results show that the methods used in scientific application, for software project management and performance assessment indicators researchers, is an important reference.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 219-220)
• Pages: 271-274
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.219-220.271
• Online since: March 2011
• Authors: Yong Chang Ren, Tao Xing, Xiao Ji Chen
• Keywords: Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Indicator System, Performance Evaluation, Performance Management, Software Project Management

References

[1] Li GW, Design of project performance management system in DT software company,, MBA Dissertation of Sichuan University, (2006).

[2] Liu Dan, Performance Appraisal Study of Develpers in Medium-small Software Enterprises," Master,s degree of Lanzhou Institute of Technology University, (2008).

[3] WU Qizong, System Engineering,, Beijing Institute of Technology University Pryss, (2005).

[4] Zhao SM, Performance Management and Evaluation,, Higher Education Press, (2004).

[5] Ren YC, Xing T, Liu DC, Establishment of Comprehensive Capacity Evaluation Index System on System Analyst,, Scientific Reseach Publishing, USA, (2010).

[6] Jia H, Zhou B, Liu GB, Advantage Analysis of Risk Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process,, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, vol. 30, no. 2, pp.72-76, (2009).

[7] Zhang ZY, Ye CQ, Fan KF, et al., Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based utilities evaluation and adoption for DRM security policies,, Journal on Communications, vol. 30, no. S1, pp.126-131, (2009).

[8] Wang CY, The Change from Performance Assess to Performance Management is the Profound Change in Human Resource Management Method,, Journal of Jilin Province Economic Management Cadre College, vol. 20, no. 1, pp.42-44, (2006).

[9] Jiang RH, Li SZ, Strategic Management and Performance Management Software System Integration,, Science &Technology Progress and Policy, vol. 25, no. 10, pp.128-130, (2008).