Paper Titles

Numerical Model for Prediction of Cutting Force in Peripheral Milling Process Including Thrust and Tangential Damping
p.122

FEM Based Design of a Chip Breaker for the Machining with PCD Tools
p.133

3D FEM Model for the Prediction of Chip Breakage
p.142

A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Deformation Zones and the Corresponding Cutting Forces in Orthogonal Cutting
p.152

On Methodologies inside Two Different Commercial Codes to Simulate the Cutting Operation
p.162

Application of the Nodal Integrated Finite Element Method to Cutting: a Preliminary Comparison with the “Traditional” FEM Approach
p.172

Validation of Finite Element Modeling of Drilling Processes with Solid Tooling in Metals
p.182

Coating-Substrate-Simulation with an Advanced Adaptive Finite Element Code
p.191

Virtual Reality Animation of Chip Formation during Turning
p.203

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 223On Methodologies inside Two Different Commercial...

On Methodologies inside Two Different Commercial Codes to Simulate the Cutting Operation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nowadays, numerical simulation of cutting processes receives considerable interest among the scientific and industrial communities. For that, various numerical codes are used. Nevertheless, there is no uniform standard for the comparison of simulation model with these different software. So, it is often not easy to state if a given code is more pertinent than another. In this framework, the present work deals with various methodologies to simulate orthogonal cutting operation inside two commercial codes Abaqus and Deform. The aim of the present paper is to build a common benchmark model between the two pre-cited codes which can initiate other numerical cutting model comparisons. The study is focused on the typical aeronautical material - Ti-6Al-4V - Titanium alloy. In order to carry out a comparative study between the two codes, some similar conditions concerning geometrical models and cutting parameters were respected. A multi-physic comprehension related to chip formation, cutting forces and temperature evolutions, and surface integrity is presented. Moreover, the numerical results are compared with experimental ones.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Modelling of Machining Operations

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 223)

Pages:

162-171

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.223.162

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2011

Authors:

Yan Cheng Zhang, Domenico Umbrello, Tarek Mabrouki, Stefania Rizzuti, Daniel Nelias, Ya Dong Gong

Keywords:

Cutting, Finite Element Model (FEM), Ti6-Al-4V

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Mabrouki, F. Girardin, M. Asad, and J.F. Rigal: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48 (2008), pp.1187-1197

[2] D. Umbrello, J.C. Outeiro, R.M. Saoubi, A.D. Jayal, and I.S. Jawahir: CIRP Annals -Manufacturing Technology. 59 (2010), pp.113-116

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.061

[3] E. Usui, T. Shirakashi, in: Proceedings of the first international conference on production engineering. Part I (1974), pp.535-540

[4] R. Gandikota, V.A. Madhavan, and V. Agarwal: AIAA Journal. 38(2000), pp.2176-2186

[5] E. Merchant: Transaction of the ASME, Jour. App. Mech. 66 (1944), pp.168-175

[6] P.J. Arrazola, D. Ugarte, J. Montoya, A. Villar, and S. Marya, in: VIII International Conference on Computational Plasticity COMPLAS VIII, Barcelona (2005)

[7] L. Deshayes, R. Ivester, T. Mabrouki, and J.F. Rigal, in: Proceedings of IMECE, November 13-20, Anaheim, California, USA (2004)

[8] J. Soriano, I. Llanos, T. Özel, P.J. Arrazola, In: 12th Cirp Conference on Modelling of Machining Operations, Donostia San Sebastián, Spain, May 7-8 (2009)

[9] J.C. Williams, G. Lutjering: Titanium. Springer – Verlag (2003)

[10] Information on http://www.matweb.com

[11] K.C. Mills: Recommended values of thermo physical properties for selected commercial alloys, Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge, Woodhead Publishing Limited (2002)

[12] G.R. Johnson, W.H. Cook, In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, the Hague, (1983) pp.31-48

[13] L. Chen, T.I. El-Wardany, and W.C. Harris: CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 53 (2004) pp.95-98

[14] A. Hillerborga, M. Modéera, and P.E. Petersson: Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements, Cement and concrete research, 6 (1976), pp.773-782

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7

[15] K.L. Johnson: Contact mechanics, Cambridge university press, Cambridge (1985)

[16] T. Mabrouki, J.F. Rigal: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 176 (2006), pp.214-221

[17] Deform®-User Manual. SFTC-Deform V10.0.2, Columbus (OH), USA (2010)

[18] M.G. Cockroft, D.J. Latham: J. Inst. Met. 96 (1968), pp.33-39

[19] Y.C. Yen: Modeling of metal cutting and ball burnishing – Prediction of tool wear and surface properties, PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University (2004)

[20] D. Umbrello: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 196 (2008), pp.79-87

[21] H. Jiang, R. Shivpuri: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 150 (2004), pp.124-133

[22] M. Calamaz, D. Coupard, and F. Girot: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48 (2008), p.275–288

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.014

[23] C.R. Liu, Y.B. Guo: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 42 (2000), pp.1069-1086