Experimental Study on Dynamic Simulation of Circulating Cooling Water Biofouling

Article Preview

Abstract:

To study the formation mechanism and the chemical component of biofouling, the biofouling formation was simulated by the dynamic simulation device of circulating cooling water under the constant condition of 30°C and 0.4 m/s. The slime-forming bacteria and Iron Bacteria were selected as the research subject. Adsorption theory of bacteria in the solid/liquid interface was analyzed by colloidal stability theory. The two kinds of bacteria on heat transfer and the relationship between the total number of bacteria and fouling resistance were studied. The main component of biofouling was characterized using XPS. The results show that Iron Bacteria on the negative effects of heat transfer is greater than the slime-forming bacteria. The total number of bacteria is the maximum in the end of the induction period. The main component of biofouling of the slime-forming bacteria of iron bacteria is C, O, N, Fe, Ca, Mg, etc. The major elements of the ratio in different strains exists diversity in the stainless steel heat exchanger, but the most important elements is carbon and oxygen.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 233-235)

Pages:

1040-1043

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Adkins, J. D., Mera, A. E., Roe-Short, M. A., Pawlikowski, G. T., and Brady, R. F.. Prog. Org. Coatings, Vol. 29 (1996), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] Shanrang Yang, Zhiming Xu and Lingfang Sun, in: Fouling and countermeasures of heat transfer equipment. Second Edition, Beijing: Science Press,2004:8.

Google Scholar

[3] Swee Loong Khordeng and Darren Delai Sun,et al. Pro. Bio., Vol.42 (2007),pp.1641-1648.

Google Scholar

[4] Melo Luis F, in: An Overview of Biofouling: From Basic Science to Mitigation. Understanding Heat Exchanger Fouling and Its Mitigation. New York, Begell House, Inc., 1997. p.55.

Google Scholar

[5] Liju Yang,Padmapriya P.Banada and Yi-Shao Liu, et al. Bio. Bio., 92(2005), p.685.

Google Scholar

[6] S. E. Coetser,T. E. Cloete. Crit Rev Microbiol., Vol. 31(2005), p.213

Google Scholar

[7] Samuelsson M. O., Kirchman D. L. Appl. emir. Microbiol. Vol.56(1990), p.3643.

Google Scholar

[8] Lazarova V., Capdeville B. and Nikolov L. Wat. Sci. Technol. Vol.26(1992)), p.555.

Google Scholar

[9] H.J. Busscher, M.N. Bellon-Fontaine, N. Mozes, H.C.van der Mei, J. Sjollema, A.J. Leonard, P.G. Rouxhet, O.Cerf, J. Microbiol. Methods, Vol.12 (1990), p.101.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(90)90020-7

Google Scholar

[10] M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, J. Lyklema and W. Norde,et al. Ecol. Vol.17 (1989), p.1.

Google Scholar

[11] Morton S C, Zhang Y and Edwards MA. Water Research,Vol.39(2005),p.2883.

Google Scholar