Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Furfural Residues Using Crude Trichoderma cellulases

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to compare the hydrolytic potential of the cellulase produced by Trichoderma pseudokoningii and by Trichoderma koningii in the enzymatic hydrolysis of furfural residues with different cellulose content. The results showed that the glucose yield was improved by increasing the cellulose of the substrates. The maximum glucose yield of 83.7% was obtained when the substrates with cellulose content of 94.92%, which was hydrolyzed by the enzymes produced by Trichoderma pseudokoningii. The cellulolytic enzyme from Trichoderma pseudokoningii was found to have a high hydrolysis capability to the furfural residues and it possessed more efficient adsorption and desorption on the substrates. There was the nonproductive cellulase adsorption onto lignin in the enzymatic hydrolysis of the furfural residues by the cellulase preparations from T. strains.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 236-238)

Pages:

452-455

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.M. Xia, X.L. Shen: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 91 (2004), pp.259-262

Google Scholar

[2] T. Rogalinski, T. Ingram and G. Brunner: The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol.47 (2008), pp.54-63

Google Scholar

[3] M. G. Adsul, J. E. Ghule, H. Shaikh, R. Singh, K. B. Bastawde, D. V. Gokhale, A. J. Varma: Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 62 (2005), pp.6-10

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.010

Google Scholar

[4] Z.Y. Wen, W.Liao, S.L. Chen: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 96 (2005), pp.491-499

Google Scholar

[5] S.Kim and M.T. Holtzapple: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 97 (2006), pp.583-591

Google Scholar

[6] A.P. Niranjane, P.Madhou, T.W. Stevenson: Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Vol. 40 (2007), pp.1464-1468

Google Scholar

[7] R.K. Sukumaran, R.R. Singhania, G.M. Mathew, A.Pandey: Renewable Energy, Vol. 34 (2009), pp.421-424

Google Scholar

[8] T.Li, L.Zhang, D.G. Xiao Y.F. Chen and S.Z.Li: Liquor-making Science & Technology, Vol. 4 (2009)

Google Scholar

[9] R.Sun, X.L. Song, R.C. Sun, J.X. Jiang: Bioresources, Vol.6 (2011), pp.317-328

Google Scholar

[10] V.Anika, Liisa.V, Kaisa.M, Matti.S. A. Várnai, L. Viikari, K. Marjamaa and M. Siika-aho: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 102 (2011), pp.1220-1227

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.120

Google Scholar

[11] H.Palonen, F.Tjerneld, G. Zacchi and M.Tenkanen: Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 107 (2004), pp.65-72

Google Scholar

[12] Y.Lu, B.Yang, D.Gregg, J.N. Saddler and S.D. Mansfield: Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 98 (2002), pp.641-654

Google Scholar

[13] K. Kovács, G.Szakacs and G.Zacchi: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100 (2009), pp.1350-1357

Google Scholar