Urban Growth Management: Approaches, Experiences and Implications to China’s Urban Planning

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chinese cities expanded and developed at an astounding rate of growth during the past three decades. The consequence rise in exorbitant consumption of land resources and the impacts on the environment were recognized accordantly. Urban growth management, as one of the effective approaches to solve the problems caused by urban sprawl, has become a subject for broad discussion in the field of urban planning in the world. It is necessary to shape a union framework of growth management between national and local government. And it is recognized that these urban growth management decisions must be made in a more comprehensive and consistent intergovernmental manner. The purpose of this study is to contribute to current planning thought and practice by providing some insights into how urban growth management can be utilized to contribute to a more sustainable urban future in China.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

6725-6728

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Song Yan and C. Ding, Smart urban growth for China. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2009)

Google Scholar

[2] Pendall, R and Martin, J. Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States. A discussion paper prepared for the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.( 2002)

Google Scholar

[3] Fischel, William A. Do Growth Controls Matter? Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge Massachusetts. (1990).

Google Scholar

[4] Carruthers, John and Gudmundur Ulfarsson. Urban Sprawl and the Cost of Public Services. Working paper. University of Arizona, School of Planning, Tucson. (2002)

Google Scholar

[5] Dowall, David E. The Suburban Squeeze: Land Conversion and Regulation in the San Francisco Bay Area. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1984)

DOI: 10.1525/9780520327986

Google Scholar

[6] Kline, Jeffrey D. Comparing States With and Without Growth Management: Analysis Based on Indicators with Policy Implications—Comment. Land Use Policy. Vol. 17(2000) p.349.

DOI: 10.1016/s0264-8377(00)00034-x

Google Scholar