Mechanism Analysis and Criterion for Avoiding Risk of Karst Water Burst Flood Illustrated in Maluqing Tunnel

Article Preview

Abstract:

With 19 groups of data associated with inrush or bursting water from karst cavity, obtained from Yichang-Wanxian Railway Maluqing Tunnel field test, conceptual models of Karst Water Burst Flood (KWBF) was brought forward by statistical analysis and phenomenological induction. KWBF is super-large amount of artesian water together with mud, which statically deposited in karst cavity, suddenly released into tunnel. KWBF has 3 kinds of characteristic: large scale of cavity water, high hydraulic pressure, high bed load content, dynamic supply of ground water, strong destroyed power; no foreboding, paroxysmal and intermittence, antinomy between paroxysmal and arrearage; force majeure, difficulty forecast, etc. Forecasting of Karst Water Burst Flood is conducted with rainfall seeping theory and statistical analysis method, while the base data are obtained from field quantity observation technical such as rainfall, hydrograph measure. Because of pressure dispersion between inside and outside of the cavity, seepage enlarge is evolved into conflux so that deprive groundwater from aquifer aqueduct and fracture, so, the water together with mud release suddenly from karst into tunnel. The key effect factor on KWBF is water count and silted or filling degree of conflux aqueduct. It is the essential numerical criterion that the daily rainfall must be less than 20mm if construction in the tunnel after the karst cavity has been broken through. To evade risk during construction temporary stage and permanent working stage, measure of energy releasing and pressure reducing (ERPR) must be accept. In addition, it was suggested that the key parameter of risk control for karst tunnel is water count and its cumulating velocity, mechanics characteristic of bed load filling in the conflux aqueduct.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 250-253)

Pages:

2650-2661

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] RENXuhua, CHEN Xiangrong,SHAN Zhigang.Water problems and corresponding countermeasures in projects of deep-lying long tunnels located in water-enriched regions[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(11):1924-1929.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] KANG Xiaobing, ZHANG Qiang, XU Mon. A Preliminary Study Of Water Intrusion in Zoumaling Karst Tunnel, Chongqing[J],Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006,14(01),68-71.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] William B.White. Conceptual models for karstic aquifers,speleogenesis and environment of karst aquifers.2003.

Google Scholar

[4] Shuster, E.T, and White, W.B. Seasonal fluctuations in the chemistry of limestone springs:A possible means for characterizing carbonate aquifers[J], J. Hydrology,1971,14: 93-128.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(71)90001-1

Google Scholar

[5] Laurent Eisenloht, Mahmoud Bouzelboudjen, Laszlo Kiraly. Numerical versus statistical modeling of natureal response of a karst hydrogeological system, J. hydrology ,1997(202): 244-262.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00069-3

Google Scholar

[6] LIN Chuannian, LI Liping, HAN Xingrui. Research On Forecast Method of Tunnel Water Inrush in Complex Karst Areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008,27(7):1469-1476 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] MENG Yan, LEI Mingtang.The advance and suggestion for the study on discharge rate in karst tunnel gushing[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2003,22(4):287-292.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] XU Guofeng,YANG Jianfeng,CHEN Kanfu.Surveying of hydrogeology condition and forecasting of water inflow in Cangling tunnel Taizhou—Jinyun highway[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005,24(Supp.2):5531-5542.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] LI Xinggao, LIU Weining, ZHANG Yunqing.Predicting the amount of water inflow in tunnel by stationary random model[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2002, 12(4): 60-64.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] YE Zhihua, HAN Xingrui, ZHANG Gaochao, et al.Application of expert's judging system to predicting karst water bursting in Zhujiayan tunnel[J].Carsologica Sinica,2006,25(2):139-145.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] WANG Jianxiu, YANG Lizhong, HE Jing.Trial method for simulating tunnel discharge[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(12): 1776-1780.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] LI Cangsong,HE Faliang, CHEN Chengzong. New Calculation Method of Water Inflow Quantity in Wulong Tunnel on Chongqing-Huaihua Railway,2005,26(5): 41-46. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] TIAN Hai-tao, DONG Yi-hua, WANG Yan-hui. Study on Forecasting for Water-gushed Yeild of Tunnel[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2007,5(3): 75-77. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] Liu Zhaowei. Karst waterburst mechanism and prevention countermeasures in Yuanliangshan tunnel[D], A Dissertation for Doctoral Degree, Beijing: China University of Geosciences,2004. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] ZHANG L L,FRANKLIN A. Prediction of Water Flowinto Rock Tunnels:An Analytical Solution Assuming an Hydraulic Conductivity Gradient[J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr,1993,30(1): 37-46.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(93)90174-c

Google Scholar