Principle and Experiment of Ultrasonic Subtle Atomization in CMP

Article Preview

Abstract:

The method of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) using slurry which was ultrasonic subtle atomized was researched, and the system of Ultrasonic Subtle Atomization—Chemical Mechanical Polishing was established. The effects of polish parameters on polishing were also investigated. The results show that the experimental system can fully realize the expected function of polishing, the use of slurry is about one-tenth of the amount of traditional CMP, material removal rate can reach 113.734nm/min and the surface roughness is similar to the surface roughness in the traditional way.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

287-290

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yan ZR, Lu JJ, Li YD, et al.: Technology Analysis of 300mm Wafer CMP. Semiconductor Technology, Vol. 31(2006), p.561.

Google Scholar

[2] Economikos L.: STI Planatization Using Fixed Abrasive Technology. Future Fab Vol.12, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] Li SJ, Sun LZ: A Low Cost and Residue-Free Abrasive-Free Copper CMP Process with Low Dishing. Erosion and Oxide Loss, IITC 2001/IEEE.

DOI: 10.1109/iitc.2001.930039

Google Scholar

[4] Muratov VA, Fischer TE: Tribochemical polishing. Annual Review of Materials Science Vol.30 (2000), p.27.

Google Scholar

[5] Gagliardi J, Buley T: 3M SlurryFreeTM CMP Technical Brief: Fixed Abrasives For Direct HDP STI CMP. 3M Internal Pub, Jun 2001.

Google Scholar

[6] Hahn PO: The 300mm silicon wafer-A cost and technology challenge. Microelectronic Engineering, Vol. 56(2001), p.3.

Google Scholar

[7] Braun AE: Slurries and Pads face 2001 Challenges. Semiconductor International. Vol.21 (1998), p.65.

Google Scholar

[8] Li QZ, Jin ZJ, Zhang R, et al.: Experimental Study on Influences of Dispersant on Material Removal Rate and the Surface Roughness of Cu CMP. Lubrication Engineering, Vol. 32(2007), p.70.

Google Scholar