Study on Production Performance Simulating the Low Permeability Dual Media Gas Reservoirs Pre and Post Fracturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mathematical model of dual media reservoir fracturing wells was established and the corresponding numerical calculation program was developed based on the special relationship between porosity and permeability of dual media low permeability gas reservoirs. Through comparative analysis of numerical results of production performance pre and post fracturing, effects of cross flow coefficient and fracture penetration ratio were well studied. The results show that: after a period of production, pressure decline of the gas well decreases linearly with time, whether fracturing or not, showing pseudo-steady-state characteristics; in the early stage, pressure drop in the vertical well pre-fracturing is an order of magnitude larger than the post-fracturing well in the logarithmic coordinate; the less developed the natural fracture is, the smaller the cross flow coefficient is, and the more significant role the fracturing plays in yield increasing; when the fracture penetration ratio is between 0.25~0.50, it has less impact on production, so it is suggested that the fracture penetration ratio is controlled at about 0.25 in actual dual media dense gas reservoirs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 287-290)

Pages:

86-91

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] LI Shi-lun. Lecture of Gas field Development. Southwest Petroleum University, Bei-jing, (2007) .(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Bourbiaux B, Granet S, Landereau P, et al.Scaling up Matrix-fracture Ttransfers in Dual-porosity Model: Ttheory and Application. SPE 56557, (1999).

DOI: 10.2118/56557-ms

Google Scholar

[3] Warren J E, Root P J.The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. SPEJ, (1963), 3(3): pp.245-255.

Google Scholar

[4] Coats K H.Implicit compositional simulation of single-porosit and dual-porosity reservoirs[R]. SPE 18427, (1989).

DOI: 10.2118/18427-ms

Google Scholar

[5] Xiao-liang Li, Yong-ming He. Drilling Petroleum Techniques (2008), 36(1): pp.73-75. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] Lin Huang, Qi-guo Liu. Well Testing, (2006), vol. 15(4). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Bing-guang Huang, Xin-quan Ran. Analysis method of gas reservoir engineering. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. (2004) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Yun-fang Zhai. Seepage Mechanics. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. (2003). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] Xiang-yan Kong. Higher seepage mechanics. Hefei: Science and Technology University Press, (2003). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Yue-tian Liu. The basis of numerical simulation in Reservoir. Beijing: Petroleum University Press, (2007). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] De-hao Yu. Hua-zhong Tang. Numerical Solution of Differential Equations. Beijing: Science Press, (2006). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] Qing-chun Tang. Research of Numerical Simulation Method on Vertical Fracture for Integral Hydraulic Fracturing . Jilin University, (2006). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] Qing-yang Li, Neng-chao Wang. Numerical Analysis (Fourth Edition). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, (2004). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] Shi-lun Li, Ming-hua Wang. Gas and condensate field development. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. (2004). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] Guang-tao Huang; Shi-cheng Zhang. Capacity prediction and optimization project on fractured well in medium-high permeability reservoir. Journal of China Coal Society, (2008), vol. 33(5). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar