Computer Analysis of Radar Graph Fractal Method for Wear Debris Contour

Article Preview

Abstract:

Radar graph fractal method is an effective description for the contour of wear debris. In this paper the principle that radar graph fractal dimension analyzed by computer was researched. In analysis, how to extract contour of wear debris from surrounding is looked as an important process, and three methods was introduced to deal with it: manual method is simple to do, but the result is not accurate for the process could be affected by human mistake; automatic method can deal with the case that multi-wear debris being in an graph, and do the statistic for the result, but it is not good for the graph that wear debris’ gray is similar to surrounding’s, the wear debris contour gotten by this method is often distortional, so the concepts that edge dot extracted ratio and the optimizing threshold method can be introduced to improve it; Semi-automatic method is easy to modify the gotten wear debris contour by change the contrast of graph and the gray of edge dot extracted artificially, improve the definition of wear debris contour. The method radar graph fractal dimension analyzed by computer is more simple and convenient than by hand, its result is also more accurate, better for the using of radar graph fractal description.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 291-294)

Pages:

1484-1490

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tipper J L, Firkins P J, Besong A A, et al. Characterisation of wear debris from UHMWPE on zirconia ceramic, metal-on-metal and alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses generated in a physiological anatomical hip joint simulator[J]. Wear 250 (2001): 120–128.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00653-6

Google Scholar

[2] Raadnui S. Wear debris analysis—utilization of quantitative computer image analysis: A review[J]. Tribology International, 2005, 38(10): 871-878.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.013

Google Scholar

[3] GE S R, Chen G a, Zhang X y. Fractal characterization of wear debris accumulation in the wear process[J]. Wear, 2001,251(1-12): 1227-1233.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00763-3

Google Scholar

[4] Stachowiak G W, Podsiadlo P. Towards the development of an automated wear debris classification system[J], Tribology International, 2006, 39(12): 1615-1623.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2006.01.019

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang M Q, Lu Z P, Friedrich Klaus. On the wear debris of polyether ether ketone: fractal dimensions in relation to wear mechanisms[J]. Tribology International, 1997, 30: 87-102.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-679x(96)00027-8

Google Scholar

[6] Stachowiak G W, Hamblin M G. Application of fractals to the description of shape of the debriss found in tribological systems[C]. Proc. 4th Int. Tribology Conference, 1994, 1:181-190.

Google Scholar

[7] Kirk T B, Stachowiak G W, Batchelor A W. Fractal parameters and computer image analysis applied to wear debris isolated by Ferro graph[J]. Wear,1991, 145: 347-365.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90141-g

Google Scholar

[8] Thomas L, Warren T L, Krajcinovi c D. Random cantor set models for the elastic-perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces. Wear, 1996, 196: 1-15.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06785-x

Google Scholar

[9] LIU H T, GE SH R. Description to Wear Debris Boundaries by Radar Graph Fractal Method[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, Volume52, Issue16: 1586-1590.

DOI: 10.1007/s11434-007-0307-9

Google Scholar

[10] ZhouXinLun. Digital image processing [M].Beijing: national defense industry press, 1984.

Google Scholar

[11] Pratt W R. Digital Image Processing[M]. New York: Wiley, 1977.

Google Scholar

[12] ZhangYuJin. Image processing and analysis [M] (1st edition). Beijing: tsinghua university press, 1999.

Google Scholar

[13] GuHuaMin. Application of statistical method[M]. Guangzhou: jinan university press, 1994.

Google Scholar