A Profiled Strip Measurement Equipment Based on Machine Vision

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a set of novel profiled strip parameter measurement equipment which is in serial production. In order to measure shape parameter, this paper designs the structure of equipment and illustrates method of image processing which carries on object location and shape parameter calculating work-piece for using machine vision. This method is proved to be useful and efficient in practice. This paper is innovative in four facts. First, it works using image processing which never appeared in such type of application. Similarly, the equipment can work no matter what directions that profiled strip lies. Third, the equipment can work automotive without man-made measurement error. Finally, it can be used to measure multi-kind of work-piece in the line. This method can be widely used in other similar application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 301-303)

Pages:

1267-1272

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.A. Yasnoff, J.K. Mui and J. Bacus, Error measures for scene segmentation. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 9 (1977), pp.217-231.

DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(77)90006-1

Google Scholar

[2] T. Peli, D. Malah, A study of edge detection algorithms. Comput. Graphics Image Process., Vol. 20 (1982), pp.1-21.

DOI: 10.1016/0146-664x(82)90070-3

Google Scholar

[3] W. Pratt, Digital image processing. Wiley-Interscience, New York, (1991).

Google Scholar

[4] R. -R. Ramon et al., A measure of quality for evaluating methods of segmentation and edge detection. Pattern recognition, Vol. 34(2001), pp.969-980.

Google Scholar

[5] Di Gesu, V. and Starovoitov, V., Distance-based functions for image comparison. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 20(1999), pp.207-214.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(98)00115-9

Google Scholar

[6] D. Coquin and Ph. Bolon, Application of Baddeley's distance to dissimilarity measurement between gray scale images. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 22(2001), pp.1483-1502.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(01)00104-0

Google Scholar

[7] M.D. Levine and A. Nazif, Dynamic measurement of computer generated image segmentations. IEEE Trans. PAMI-7(1985), pp.155-164.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1985.4767640

Google Scholar

[8] A.M. Nazif and M.D. Levine, Low level image segmentation: an expert system. IEEE Trans. PAMI-6(1984), pp.555-577.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1984.4767570

Google Scholar

[9] Y.J. Zhang and J.J. Gerbrands, Objective and quantitative segmentation evaluation and comparison. Signal Processing, Vol. 39(1994), pp.43-54.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90122-8

Google Scholar

[10] W.A. Yasnoff and J.W. Bacus, Scene segmentation algorithm development using error measures. AOCH, Vol. 6(1984), pp.45-58.

Google Scholar

[11] David F. Wiley, Approximation and Visualization of Scientific Data Using Higher-order Elements (2003), pp.35-36.

Google Scholar

[12] K. T. Lay and A. K. Katsaggelos, Image identification and restorationbased on the expectation-maximization algorithm, Opt. Eng., Vol. 29(1990), pp.436-445.

DOI: 10.1117/12.55612

Google Scholar

[13] R. L. Lagendijk, J. Biemond, and D. E. Boekee, Identification andrestoration of noisy blurred images using the expectation-maximizationalgorithm, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, Vol. 38(1990), pp.1180-1191.

DOI: 10.1109/29.57545

Google Scholar

[14] J. Kim and J. W. Woods, Image identification and restoration in thesub-band domain, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, Vol. 3 (1994), pp.312-314.

DOI: 10.1109/83.287026

Google Scholar

[15] A. K. Katsaggelos and R. W. Schafer, Iterative deconvolution usingseveral different distorted versions of an unknown signal, in Proc. IEEEInt. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, Boston, MA (1983), pp.659-662.

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1983.1172115

Google Scholar