Representing the Evolving Design Rationale to Support Design Reuse

Article Preview

Abstract:

Engineering design is an innovative process that relies heavily upon associations to past experience and similar designs. Design rationale (DR) explains why an artifact is designed the way it is. An explicit representation of DR can bring many benefits to understand, modify, or reuse a design. This paper argues that because the design is a cognitive activity continuously iterative and evolving, the conventional argument-based representation of DR has some inherent limitations. An intent-driven representation model is created to capture and formalize the evolving DR. The DR elements and their interactive relationships are defined. Furthermore, two methods to reconstruct the DR model, namely the structure-based clustering and the context-based extraction, are explored to reduce the complexity of the model and to support effective DR traceability for the reuse purpose. Finally, a graphical DR modeling system is developed. And the future research is discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 308-310)

Pages:

288-292

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] O. Pedgley: Design Stud. Vol. 28 (2007), p.468

Google Scholar

[2] J. Lee: IEEE Expert, Vol. 12 (1997), p.78

Google Scholar

[3] S.J. Buckingham Shum, and N. Hammond: Human-Comput. Interaction. Vol.40 (1994), p.603

Google Scholar

[4] W.C. Regli, X. Hu, M. Atwood, and W. Sun: Eng. with Comput. Vol. 16 (2000), p.209

Google Scholar

[5] R. Bracewell, K. Wallace, and M. Moss: Comput. Aided Design, Vol. 41(2009), p.173

Google Scholar

[6] H. A. Simon: The Sciences of the Artificial (The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996)

Google Scholar

[7] P. Doreian, and A. Mrvar: Social Networks. Vol. 31 (2009), p.1

Google Scholar

[8] R. Ganeshan, J. Garrett, and S. Finger: Design Stud. Vol. 15 (1994), p.59

Google Scholar

[9] E. Arai, K. Okada, and K. Iwata: Human Aspects in Comput. Integr. Manuf. 1992, p.271

Google Scholar

[10] Z. Y. Sun, S. W. Gao, and J. H. Liu: IEEE International Conference on CAD/Graphics. Yellow Mountain, 2009, p.416

Google Scholar

[11] D. Baxter, and J. Gao: Res. Eng. Des. Vol. 18 (2007), p.37

Google Scholar