Investigation of Laser Current Influence on Two-Dimensional Bar Code Contrast

Article Preview

Abstract:

Laser current is a key parameter in laser direct-part marking symbols on a substrate. Different laser current can create enormous impact on bar code contrast, but the influencing regularities are unclear. In this paper, a new significance test method based on the multivariate nonlinear model was proposed to investigate the influencing regularities. First, the multi-element nonlinear stepwise regression model between the laser current, the laser line spacing and symbol contrast was established, and then the model significance test was employed to evaluate the influence between the two factors and symbol contrast. Finally, the influencing regularities were found by comparing the influence between the laser current and the laser line spacing. These regularities are that along with the laser current value increasing the influence of laser current on symbol contrast decreases and that the effect is much smaller and can even be neglected when the laser current reaches or exceeds a certain value. This certain value is 15 A in the Nd:YAG laser Direct-part marking symbols on the aluminum alloy experiments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 314-316)

Pages:

197-204

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. C. Palmer: The Bar Code Book (Helmers Publishing Press, Peterborough NH 2001)

Google Scholar

[2] NASA: Application of Data of Data Matrix Identification Symbols to Aerospace Parts Using Direct Part Marking Methods/Techniques (NASA Press, Washington DC 2002)

Google Scholar

[3] M. F. Chen, W. T. Hsiao, W. L. Huang, et al.: Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209 (a)(2009), p.737

Google Scholar

[4] M. F. Chen, W. T. Hsiao, W. L. Huang, et al.: Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209 (b)(2009), p.470

Google Scholar

[5] B. E. Parker:, US Patent WO2,004,064,530 (2004)

Google Scholar

[6] J. David Porter: Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 129 (2007), p.583

Google Scholar

[7] J. David Porter: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 17 (2006), p.133

Google Scholar

[8] J. Qi, K. L. Wang, Y. M. Zhu: Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 139 (2003), p.273

Google Scholar

[9] C. Leone, S. Genna: Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 210 (2010), p.1297

Google Scholar

[10] S. Valette, P. Steyer, L. Richard.et al.: Applied Surface Science, Vol. 252 (2006), p.4696

Google Scholar

[11] T. W. Ng, S. C. Yeo: Optics and Laser in Engineering, Vol. 35 (2001), p.177

Google Scholar

[12] E. Cicalà, A. Soveja, P. Sallamand, et al.: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 196 (2008), p.393

Google Scholar

[13] T. Shanableh, K. Assaleh: Neurocomputing, Vol. 73 (2010), p.1752

Google Scholar

[14] J. P. Jia: Statistics (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing 2004),In Chinese

Google Scholar

[15] X. Z. Wang: Nonlinear Model Parameter Estimation Theory and Application (Wuhan University Press, Wuhan 2002)

Google Scholar

[16] A. Bortfeldt, H. Gehring: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 13 (2001), p.143

Google Scholar

[17] K. Deb,A. Pratap,S. Agarwal,et al.: Evolutionary Computation , Vol. 6 (2002), p.182

Google Scholar

[18] D. Feng : Solid State Physics Dictionary (Higher Education Press, Beijing 1995), In Chinese

Google Scholar