Fatigue Response of Centrally Notched Ti/APC-2 Nanocopmosite Laminates due to Two-Step Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Ti/AS-4 Carbon Fiber/PEEK (Ti/APC-2) cross-ply nanocomposite laminates were fabricated. The Ti thin sheets were surface treated by anodic oxidation of electroplating to achieve good bonding with APC-2 laminates. Nanoparticles SiO2 were dispersed uniformly on the interfaces of APC-2 with the optimal amount of 1 wt%. The modified diaphragm curing process was adopted to fabricate the hybrid panels. Then, the panels were cut into samples. The centrally notched samples of hole diameter 6mm. First, we obtained the mechanical properties of unnotched samples as base-line data due to tensile and cyclic tests. Then, we performed both tests for the notched samples and found that the ultimate load was reduced 53%, nominal stress 38%, stiffness 3%, and also the fatigue lives compared with unnotched ones. Next, the two-step loading tests, such as high→low and low→high tests, were conducted. The average values of Miner’s sum were less than 1.0 for both two-step tests. The total lives were in the range of 5780~29048 cycles for both tests. That evidently demonstrates the notched samples drastically drop the mechanical properties and lives from high cycle fatigue to low cycle fatigue.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

81-85

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. B. Vogelsang and J. W. Gunnink: Material and Design, 7 (6) (1986), pp.287-300.

Google Scholar

[2] T. Lin, P. W. Kao and F. S. Yang: Composites, 22, No. 2 (1991), pp.135-142.

Google Scholar

[3] M. -H. R. Jen, Y. -C. Tseng and P. -Y. Li: Journal of JSEM, 7, Special Issue (2007), pp.56-60.

Google Scholar

[4] T. E. Attwood, P. C. Dawson, L. J. Freeman and L. R. J. Hoy, J. B. Rose and P. A. Staniland: Polymer, 22 (1981), pp.1096-1103.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(81)90299-8

Google Scholar

[5] K. Ramani, W. J. Weidner and G. Kumari: Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 18 (1998), pp.401-412.

Google Scholar

[6] B. M. Ditchek, K. R. Breen, T. S. Sun and J. D. Venables, in: Proc. 25th Nat. SAMPE Symp., pp.13-24, (1980).

Google Scholar

[7] C. L. Wu, M. Q. Zhang, M. Z. Rong, K. Friedrich: Composites Science and Technology, 65 (2005), pp.635-645.

Google Scholar

[8] M. -H. R. Jen, Y. -C. Tseng, C. -H. Wu: Composites Science and Technology, 65 (2005), pp.775-779.

Google Scholar

[9] J.N. Yang, D.L. Jone: ASTM STP 813 (1983), p.213.

Google Scholar

[10] J.A. Collins: Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design: Analysis, Prediction and Prevention (John Wiley & Son, N.Y. 1981).

Google Scholar

[11] I.J. Broutman, S. Sahu: ASTM STP 497 (1972), p.170.

Google Scholar

[12] M.J. Owen: Composite Materials, Vol. 5, Fracture and Fatigue (1974), Broutman, ed., N. Y.

Google Scholar

[13] W. Hwang, K.S. Han: J. of Composite Materials, Vol. 20 (1986), p.125.

Google Scholar

[14] M. -H.R. Jen and C. -H. Lee: Int. J. of Fatigue, Vol. 20, Issue9 (1998), p.605.

Google Scholar

[15] M. -H.R. Jen and C. -H. Lee: Int. J. of Fatigue, Vol. 20, Issue9 (1998), p.617.

Google Scholar

[16] M. -H.R. Jen, Y. -C. Sung, C. -K. Chang, F. -C. Hsu, in: Fifth Int. Conference on Fatigue of Composites, Oct. Nanjing, China (2010), pp.317-325.

Google Scholar