A Research on Rating System of Green Construction

Article Preview

Abstract:

Now no complete and authorized rating system of green construction has ever been issued in China, which has made it impossible to promote the ideal of green construction in the country. Therefore, establishing a rating system in this field has become urgent. To tries to establish a framework for rating green construction through three folds, including environmental impact during the construction process, energy efficiency and on-site comprehensive management. As green building, a complex product constituting a multitude of goals and factors, features Grey System, to proposes using grey clustering model to certify building projects so as to better achieve the goals of greener construction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

186-191

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Du, Nan. A Research on Green Construction and Green Construction Rating System (Master's Degree Thesis). Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] Liu, Chunjiang. Rating Technologies and Methods of Green Construction [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Li, Meiyun and Fan, Shenliang. A Research on Rating System of Green Construction Engineering and Construction, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] R. J. Cole. Building Environmental Assessment Methods: Assessing Construction Practices [J] Construction Management Economics, 2000, 18(8): 949-957.

DOI: 10.1080/014461900446902

Google Scholar

[5] ZhenChen, Hengli. Environmental Management of Urban Construction Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2000, (4): 320-324.

Google Scholar

[6] C.M. Tam W.Y. Tam, W.S. Tsui. Green Construction Assessment for Environmental Management in the Construction Industry of Hong Kong International Journal of Project Management. 2004, 22(7): 56-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.001

Google Scholar