Flow Stress Constitutive Equation of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy for Hot Compression

Wen Hua Wu; Yan Lou

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.1614

Paper Titles

Numerical Simulation of Hot Forging for the Disc of Superalloy GH4169
p.1598

Constitutive Modeling for the Prediction of Peak Stress in Hot Deformation Processing of Al Alloy Based Nanocomposite
p.1602

Microstructure and Properties of Surface Nanostructured Copper
p.1606

Investigation on Properties of a New CB/WPUA Composite Coating
p.1610

Flow Stress Constitutive Equation of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy for Hot Compression
p.1614

Effect of Microwave Drying on Dyeing Rate of Cotton Yarn
p.1619

Research on Inner Cooling Apparatus Sets in the Mold of 700mm×700mm Bloom
p.1623

Study on the Graphite-Based Cementitious Material for the Soil Moisture Detective Probe
p.1627

Preparation and Applications of Compatibilizer in HPVC/EPDM
p.1632

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 328-330Flow Stress Constitutive Equation of AZ31...

Flow Stress Constitutive Equation of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy for Hot Compression

Abstract:

The AZ31 magnesium alloy flow stresses have been investigated in the strain rates of 0.03~3s^-1 and temperature range of 300~400°C. The result showed that dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization occurred obviously during the hot compression of AZ31 magnesium alloy. In order to represent the flow stress of plastic deformation accurately, the constitutive equation was built by using the dynamic recovery model and dynamic recrystallization model, and its parameters of the constitutive equation were determined by multivariate nonlinear regression analysis. The two-step constitutive equation not only expressed the variation of flow stress with strain rate, deformation temperature and strain, but also revealed the characteristic of dynamic recrystallization kinetics of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Its accuracy was higher than the flow stress of hyperbolic sine model, and the maximum relative errors of two constitutive equation models calculation values compared with experiment data were 5% and 6.5% respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 328-330)

Pages:

1614-1618

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.1614

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Wen Hua Wu, Yan Lou

Keywords:

AZ31 Magnesium Alloy, Constitutive Equation, Dynamic Recrystallization (DRX), Hot Compression Deformation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] I. Rieiro, V. Gutierrez, J. Castellanos, M. Carsi, M.T. Larrea and O.A. Ruano: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 41 (2010) No. 9, p.2396.

Google Scholar

[2] Yong Qi Cheng, Hui Zhang, Zhen Hua Chen and Kui Feng Xian: Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 208 (2008) No. 1-3, p.29.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Yazdipour, C.H.J. Davies, and P.D. Hodgson: Computational Materials Science, 2008, 44, p.566.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Rabbe: The Simulation of Materials Microstructure and Properties (Wiely-VCH, 1998).

Google Scholar

[5] JIN Zhao-yang and CUI Zhen-shan: Journal Of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Vol. 44 (2010) No. 4, p.437.

Google Scholar

[6] Avrami M: Journal of Chemical Physis, 1939, (7), p.1103.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Laasraoui and J.J. Jonas: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 22 (1991) No. 7, p.1545.

Google Scholar

[8] E.I. Poliak and J.J. Jonas: Acta Materialia, Vol. 44 (1996) No. 1, p.127.

Google Scholar

[9] Sellars CM and Mctegart WJ: Acta Metallurgica, 1966, 14(9), p.1136.

Google Scholar

[10] Zener C and Hollomon H. J: Appl Phys, 1944, 15(1), p.22.

Google Scholar